Can you split a stream into two streams?

前端 未结 10 665
栀梦
栀梦 2020-11-27 12:03

I have a data set represented by a Java 8 stream:

Stream stream = ...;

I can see how to filter it to get a random subset - for exa

相关标签:
10条回答
  • 2020-11-27 12:22

    not exactly, but you may be able to accomplish what you need by invoking Collectors.groupingBy(). you create a new Collection, and can then instantiate streams on that new collection.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 12:22

    Shorter version that uses Lombok

    import java.util.function.Consumer;
    import java.util.function.Predicate;
    
    import lombok.RequiredArgsConstructor;
    
    /**
     * Forks a Stream using a Predicate into postive and negative outcomes.
     */
    @RequiredArgsConstructor
    @FieldDefaults(makeFinal = true, level = AccessLevel.PROTECTED)
    public class StreamForkerUtil<T> implements Consumer<T> {
        Predicate<T> predicate;
        Consumer<T> positiveConsumer;
        Consumer<T> negativeConsumer;
    
        @Override
        public void accept(T t) {
            (predicate.test(t) ? positiveConsumer : negativeConsumer).accept(t);
        }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 12:24

    I stumbled across this question while looking for a way to filter certain elements out of a stream and log them as errors. So I did not really need to split the stream so much as attach a premature terminating action to a predicate with unobtrusive syntax. This is what I came up with:

    public class MyProcess {
        /* Return a Predicate that performs a bail-out action on non-matching items. */
        private static <T> Predicate<T> withAltAction(Predicate<T> pred, Consumer<T> altAction) {
        return x -> {
            if (pred.test(x)) {
                return true;
            }
            altAction.accept(x);
            return false;
        };
    
        /* Example usage in non-trivial pipeline */
        public void processItems(Stream<Item> stream) {
            stream.filter(Objects::nonNull)
                  .peek(this::logItem)
                  .map(Item::getSubItems)
                  .filter(withAltAction(SubItem::isValid,
                                        i -> logError(i, "Invalid")))
                  .peek(this::logSubItem)
                  .filter(withAltAction(i -> i.size() > 10,
                                        i -> logError(i, "Too large")))
                  .map(SubItem::toDisplayItem)
                  .forEach(this::display);
        }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 12:28

    A collector can be used for this.

    • For two categories, use Collectors.partitioningBy() factory.

    This will create a Map from Boolean to List, and put items in one or the other list based on a Predicate.

    Note: Since the stream needs to be consumed whole, this can't work on infinite streams. And because the stream is consumed anyway, this method simply puts them in Lists instead of making a new stream-with-memory. You can always stream those lists if you require streams as output.

    Also, no need for the iterator, not even in the heads-only example you provided.

    • Binary splitting looks like this:
    Random r = new Random();
    
    Map<Boolean, List<String>> groups = stream
        .collect(Collectors.partitioningBy(x -> r.nextBoolean()));
    
    System.out.println(groups.get(false).size());
    System.out.println(groups.get(true).size());
    
    • For more categories, use a Collectors.groupingBy() factory.
    Map<Object, List<String>> groups = stream
        .collect(Collectors.groupingBy(x -> r.nextInt(3)));
    System.out.println(groups.get(0).size());
    System.out.println(groups.get(1).size());
    System.out.println(groups.get(2).size());
    

    In case the streams are not Stream, but one of the primitive streams like IntStream, then this .collect(Collectors) method is not available. You'll have to do it the manual way without a collector factory. It's implementation looks like this:

    [Example 2.0 since 2020-04-16]

        IntStream    intStream = IntStream.iterate(0, i -> i + 1).limit(100000).parallel();
        IntPredicate predicate = ignored -> r.nextBoolean();
    
        Map<Boolean, List<Integer>> groups = intStream.collect(
                () -> Map.of(false, new ArrayList<>(100000),
                             true , new ArrayList<>(100000)),
                (map, value) -> map.get(predicate.test(value)).add(value),
                (map1, map2) -> {
                    map1.get(false).addAll(map2.get(false));
                    map1.get(true ).addAll(map2.get(true ));
                });
    

    In this example I initialize the ArrayLists with the full size of the initial collection (if this is known at all). This prevents resize events even in the worst-case scenario, but can potentially gobble up 2*N*T space (N = initial number of elements, T = number of threads). To trade-off space for speed, you can leave it out or use your best educated guess, like the expected highest number of elements in one partition (typically just over N/2 for a balanced split).

    I hope I don't offend anyone by using a Java 9 method. For the Java 8 version, look at the edit history.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 12:28

    Unfortunately, what you ask for is directly frowned upon in the JavaDoc of Stream:

    A stream should be operated on (invoking an intermediate or terminal stream operation) only once. This rules out, for example, "forked" streams, where the same source feeds two or more pipelines, or multiple traversals of the same stream.

    You can work around this using peek or other methods should you truly desire that type of behaviour. In this case, what you should do is instead of trying to back two streams from the same original Stream source with a forking filter, you would duplicate your stream and filter each of the duplicates appropriately.

    However, you may wish to reconsider if a Stream is the appropriate structure for your use case.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 12:34

    This was the least bad answer I could come up with.

    import org.apache.commons.lang3.tuple.ImmutablePair;
    import org.apache.commons.lang3.tuple.Pair;
    
    public class Test {
    
        public static <T, L, R> Pair<L, R> splitStream(Stream<T> inputStream, Predicate<T> predicate,
                Function<Stream<T>, L> trueStreamProcessor, Function<Stream<T>, R> falseStreamProcessor) {
    
            Map<Boolean, List<T>> partitioned = inputStream.collect(Collectors.partitioningBy(predicate));
            L trueResult = trueStreamProcessor.apply(partitioned.get(Boolean.TRUE).stream());
            R falseResult = falseStreamProcessor.apply(partitioned.get(Boolean.FALSE).stream());
    
            return new ImmutablePair<L, R>(trueResult, falseResult);
        }
    
        public static void main(String[] args) {
    
            Stream<Integer> stream = Stream.iterate(0, n -> n + 1).limit(10);
    
            Pair<List<Integer>, String> results = splitStream(stream,
                    n -> n > 5,
                    s -> s.filter(n -> n % 2 == 0).collect(Collectors.toList()),
                    s -> s.map(n -> n.toString()).collect(Collectors.joining("|")));
    
            System.out.println(results);
        }
    
    }
    

    This takes a stream of integers and splits them at 5. For those greater than 5 it filters only even numbers and puts them in a list. For the rest it joins them with |.

    outputs:

     ([6, 8],0|1|2|3|4|5)
    

    Its not ideal as it collects everything into intermediary collections breaking the stream (and has too many arguments!)

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题