Make 'n' always search forwards, regardless of whether / or ? was used for searching

前端 未结 2 892
臣服心动
臣服心动 2021-02-09 07:39

I almost always search in Vim with /, and then continue searching forwards with n and backwards with N. Sometimes, however, I use ?<

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2021-02-09 08:09

    That is just the way it is, notwithstanding some debate on the developers' mailing list ...

    Here's what you can do about it:

    :noremap n /<CR>
    :noremap N ?<CR>
    

    Relevant mailing list thread with a lot more interesting info: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/vim_dev/8jSoA931P2Y/JklYtxFOiAYJ

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-09 08:10

    This was taken from ZyX's post on the vim mailing list.

    noremap <expr> n 'Nn'[v:searchforward]
    noremap <expr> N 'nN'[v:searchforward]
    

    It maps n to the original N or n based off of the variable v:searchforward by indexing 'Nn' as a list of two elements. This only works because the mapping is non-recursive. If it was recursive this would call it self and you would be in an infinite loop.

    When v:searchforward == 1 (search forward) the mappings are equivalent to

    noremap <expr> n n
    noremap <expr> N N
    

    and when v:searchfoward == 0 (search backwards) the mappings are equivalent to

    noremap <expr> n N
    noremap <expr> N n
    

    This mapping works in Normal, Visual, and Operator pending modes.


    I probably would have written it like this. (Although I'm not sure this is any clearer)

    noremap <expr> n (v:searchforward ? 'n' : 'N')
    noremap <expr> N (v:searchforward ? 'N' : 'n')
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题