Do browsers render canvas elements that are not inside the viewport?

前端 未结 2 2029
独厮守ぢ
独厮守ぢ 2021-02-09 05:15

I have a page that has pretty heavy (mid-weight rather) canvas operations going on. To cater for users on mobile devices and older computers I was thinking I could

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2021-02-09 05:20

    From my own experience it renders whatever you tell it to render regardless of position on screen.

    An example is if you draw tiles, that exceeds the canvas size, you will still see the performance drop unless you optimize the script.

    Try your function with a performance demanding animation, and see if you still get the same results.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-09 05:38

    I think you're confused between whether the logic is running and whether the rendering is happening. Many browsers now hardware-accelerate their canvases so all rendering happens on the GPU, so actual pixel pushing takes no CPU time anyway. However your tick function has non-trivial code to generate random noise on the CPU. So you're only really concerned over whether the tick function is running. If the canvas is offscreen, it certainly won't be rendered to the display (it's not visible). As for the canvas draw calls, it probably depends on the browser. It could render all draw calls to an off-screen canvas in case you suddenly scroll it back in to view, or it could just queue up all the draw calls and not actually do anything with them until you scroll the canvas in to view. I'm not sure what each browser does there.

    However, you shouldn't use setInterval or setTimeout for animating Canvas. Use the new requestAnimationFrame API. Browsers don't know what you do in a timer call so will always call the timer. requestAnimationFrame on the other hand is designed specifically for visual things, so the browser has the opportunity to not call the tick function, or to reduce the rate it's called at, if the canvas or page is not visible.

    As for how browsers actually handle it, I'm not sure. However, you should definitely prefer it since future browsers may be able to better optimise requestAnimationFrame in ways they cannot optimise setInterval or setTimeout. I think modern browsers also reduce the ordinary timers to 1 Hz if the page is not visible, but it's definitely much easier for the browser to optimise requestAnimationFrame, plus some browsers get you V-syncing and other niceness with it.

    So I'm not certain requestAnimationFrame will mean your tick function is not called if the canvas is scrolled out of view. So I'd recommend using both requestAnimationFrame and the existing visibility check. That should guarantee you the most efficient rendering.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题