How to convert a string of numbers to an array of numbers?

前端 未结 15 1960
死守一世寂寞
死守一世寂寞 2020-11-27 10:29

I have below string -

var a = \"1,2,3,4\";

when I do -

var b = a.split(\',\');

I get b as

相关标签:
15条回答
  • 2020-11-27 10:48

    A more shorter solution: map and pass the arguments to Number:

    var a = "1,2,3,4";
    var b = a.split(',');
    console.log(b);
    var c = b.map(Number);
    console.log(c);

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 10:51

    +string will try to change the string to a number. Then use Array.map function to change every element.

    "1,2,3,4".split(',').map(function(el){ return +el;});
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 10:53

    Matt Zeunert's version with use arraw function (ES6)

    const nums = a.split(',').map(x => parseInt(x, 10));
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 10:55

    There's no need to use lambdas and/or give radix parameter to parseInt, just use parseFloat or Number instead.

    Reasons:

    1. It's working:

      var src = "1,2,5,4,3";
      var ids = src.split(',').map(parseFloat); // [1, 2, 5, 4, 3]
      
      var obj = {1: ..., 3: ..., 4: ..., 7: ...};
      var keys= Object.keys(obj); // ["1", "3", "4", "7"]
      var ids = keys.map(parseFloat); // [1, 3, 4, 7]
      
      var arr = ["1", 5, "7", 11];
      var ints= arr.map(parseFloat); // [1, 5, 7, 11]
      ints[1] === "5" // false
      ints[1] === 5   // true
      ints[2] === "7" // false
      ints[2] === 7   // true
      
    2. It's shorter.

    3. It's a tiny bit quickier and takes advantage of cache, when parseInt-approach - doesn't:

        // execution time measure function
        // keep it simple, yeah?
      > var f = (function (arr, c, n, m) {
            var i,t,m,s=n();
            for(i=0;i++<c;)t=arr.map(m);
            return n()-s
        }).bind(null, "2,4,6,8,0,9,7,5,3,1".split(','), 1000000, Date.now);
      
      > f(Number) // first launch, just warming-up cache
      > 3971 // nice =)
      
      > f(Number)
      > 3964 // still the same
      
      > f(function(e){return+e})
      > 5132 // yup, just little bit slower
      
      > f(function(e){return+e})
      > 5112 // second run... and ok.
      
      > f(parseFloat)
      > 3727 // little bit quicker than .map(Number)
      
      > f(parseFloat)
      > 3737 // all ok
      
      > f(function(e){return parseInt(e,10)})
      > 21852 // awww, how adorable...
      
      > f(function(e){return parseInt(e)})
      > 22928 // maybe, without '10'?.. nope.
      
      > f(function(e){return parseInt(e)})
      > 22769 // second run... and nothing changes.
      
      > f(Number)
      > 3873 // and again
      > f(parseFloat)
      > 3583 // and again
      > f(function(e){return+e})
      > 4967 // and again
      
      > f(function(e){return parseInt(e,10)})
      > 21649 // dammit 'parseInt'! >_<
      

    Notice: In Firefox parseInt works about 4 times faster, but still slower than others. In total: +e < Number < parseFloat < parseInt

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 10:59

    This is very simple.Such as:

    ["1", "2", "3", "4"].map(i=>Number(i))
    

    you can run the demo.

    let result = ["1", "2", "3", "4"].map(i=>Number(i));
    console.log(result);

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 11:06

    As a variant you can use combiantion _.map and _.ary methods from the lodash library. Whole transformation will be a more compact. Here is example from the official documentation:

    _.map(['6', '8', '10'], _.ary(parseInt, 1));
    // → [6, 8, 10]
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题