When is not a good time to use python generators?

前端 未结 9 879
不思量自难忘°
不思量自难忘° 2020-11-27 10:27

This is rather the inverse of What can you use Python generator functions for?: python generators, generator expressions, and the itertools module are some of m

相关标签:
9条回答
  • 2020-11-27 11:00

    I've never found a situation where generators would hinder what you're trying to do. There are, however, plenty of instances where using generators would not help you any more than not using them.

    For example:

    sorted(xrange(5))
    

    Does not offer any improvement over:

    sorted(range(5))
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 11:05

    As far as performance is concerned, I can't think of any times that you would want to use a list over a generator.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 11:06

    Regarding performance: if using psyco, lists can be quite a bit faster than generators. In the example below, lists are almost 50% faster when using psyco.full()

    import psyco
    import time
    import cStringIO
    
    def time_func(func):
        """The amount of time it requires func to run"""
        start = time.clock()
        func()
        return time.clock() - start
    
    def fizzbuzz(num):
        """That algorithm we all know and love"""
        if not num % 3 and not num % 5:
            return "%d fizz buzz" % num
        elif not num % 3:
            return "%d fizz" % num
        elif not num % 5:
            return "%d buzz" % num
        return None
    
    def with_list(num):
        """Try getting fizzbuzz with a list comprehension and range"""
        out = cStringIO.StringIO()
        for fibby in [fizzbuzz(x) for x in range(1, num) if fizzbuzz(x)]:
            print >> out, fibby
        return out.getvalue()
    
    def with_genx(num):
        """Try getting fizzbuzz with generator expression and xrange"""
        out = cStringIO.StringIO()
        for fibby in (fizzbuzz(x) for x in xrange(1, num) if fizzbuzz(x)):
            print >> out, fibby
        return out.getvalue()
    
    def main():
        """
        Test speed of generator expressions versus list comprehensions,
        with and without psyco.
        """
    
        #our variables
        nums = [10000, 100000]
        funcs = [with_list, with_genx]
    
        #  try without psyco 1st
        print "without psyco"
        for num in nums:
            print "  number:", num
            for func in funcs:
                print func.__name__, time_func(lambda : func(num)), "seconds"
            print
    
        #  now with psyco
        print "with psyco"
        psyco.full()
        for num in nums:
            print "  number:", num
            for func in funcs:
                print func.__name__, time_func(lambda : func(num)), "seconds"
            print
    
    if __name__ == "__main__":
        main()
    

    Results:

    without psyco
      number: 10000
    with_list 0.0519102208309 seconds
    with_genx 0.0535933367509 seconds
    
      number: 100000
    with_list 0.542204280744 seconds
    with_genx 0.557837353115 seconds
    
    with psyco
      number: 10000
    with_list 0.0286369007033 seconds
    with_genx 0.0513424889137 seconds
    
      number: 100000
    with_list 0.335414877839 seconds
    with_genx 0.580363490491 seconds
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题