Fast Prime Factorization Algorithm

前端 未结 2 723
抹茶落季
抹茶落季 2021-02-09 02:05

I\'m writing a code in C that returns the number of times a positive integer can be expressed as sums of perfect squares of two positive integers.

R(n) is the nu         


        
相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2021-02-09 02:21

    There's a fast way to cut down the number of candidates. This routine tries 2, then 3, then all the odd numbers not divisible by 3.

    long mediumFactor(n)
    {
        if ((n % 2) == 0) return 2;
        if ((n % 3) == 0) return 3;
        try = 5;
        inc = 2;
        lim = sqrt(n);
        while (try <= lim)
        {
           if ((n % try) == 0) return try;
           try += inc;
           inc = 6 - inc;  // flip from 2 -> 4 -> 2
        }
        return 1;  // n is prime
    }
    

    The alternation of inc between 2 and 4 is carefully aligned so that it skips all even numbers and numbers divisible by 3. For this case: 5 (+2) 7 (+4) 11 (+2) 13 (+4) 17

    Trials stop at sqrt(n) because at least one factor must be at or below the square root. (If both factors were > sqrt(n) then the product of the factors would be greater than n.)

    Number of tries is sqrt(m)/3, where m is the highest possible number in your series. For a limit of 2147483647, that yields a maximum of 15,448 divisions worst case (for a prime near 2147483647) including the 2 and 3 tests.

    If the number is composite, total number of divisions is usually much less and will very rarely be more; even taking into account calling the routine repeatedly to get all the factors.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-09 02:28

    What an odd limit; 2147483742 = 2^31 + 94.

    As others have pointed out, for a number this small trial division by primes is most likely fast enough. Only if it isn't, you could try Pollard's rho method:

    /* WARNING! UNTESTED CODE! */
    long rho(n, c) {
        long t = 2;
        long h = 2;
        long d = 1;
    
        while (d == 1) {
            t = (t*t + c) % n;
            h = (h*h + c) % n;
            h = (h*h + c) % n;
            d = gcd(t-h, n); }
    
        if (d == n)
            return rho(n, c+1);
        return d;
    }
    

    Called as rho(n,1), this function returns a (possibly-composite) factor of n; put it in a loop and call it repeatedly if you want to find all the factors of n. You'll also need a primality checker; for your limit, a Rabin-Miller test with bases 2, 7 and 61 is proven accurate and reasonably fast. You can read more about programming with prime numbers at my blog.

    But in any case, given such a small limit I think you are better off using trial division by primes. Anything else might be asymptotically faster but practically slower.

    EDIT: This answer has received several recent upvotes, so I'm adding a simple program that does wheel factorization with a 2,3,5-wheel. Called as wheel(n), this program prints the factors of n in increasing order.

    long wheel(long n) {
        long ws[] = {1,2,2,4,2,4,2,4,6,2,6};
        long f = 2; int w = 0;
    
        while (f * f <= n) {
            if (n % f == 0) {
                printf("%ld\n", f);
                n /= f;
            } else {
                f += ws[w];
                w = (w == 10) ? 3 : (w+1);
            }
        }
        printf("%ld\n", n);
    
        return 0;
    }
    

    I discuss wheel factorization at my blog; the explanation is lengthy, so I won't repeat it here. For integers that fit in a long, it is unlikely that you will be able to significantly better the wheel function given above.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题