ES6+ javascript module export options

后端 未结 3 926
独厮守ぢ
独厮守ぢ 2020-11-27 09:32

I\'ve seen public exports of ES6 modules done in both of the following ways:

// method 1
export var getAnswer = function () { return \'forty two\'; };

// me         


        
相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2020-11-27 10:08

    A year and some later, here is the best information I've found on the subject.

    There are 4 types of exports. Here are usage examples of each, along with some imports that use them:

    Export Syntax

    // default exports
    export default 42;
    export default {};
    export default [];
    export default (1 + 2);
    export default foo;
    export default function () {}
    export default class {}
    export default function foo () {}
    export default class foo {}
    
    // variables exports
    export var foo = 1;
    export var foo = function () {};
    export var bar;
    export let foo = 2;
    export let bar;
    export const foo = 3;
    export function foo () {}
    export class foo {}
    
    // named exports
    export {};
    export {foo};
    export {foo, bar};
    export {foo as bar};
    export {foo as default};
    export {foo as default, bar};
    
    // exports from
    export * from "foo";
    export {} from "foo";
    export {foo} from "foo";
    export {foo, bar} from "foo";
    export {foo as bar} from "foo";
    export {foo as default} from "foo";
    export {foo as default, bar} from "foo";
    export {default} from "foo";
    export {default as foo} from "foo";
    

    Import Syntax

    // default imports
    import foo from "foo";
    import {default as foo} from "foo";
    
    // named imports
    import {} from "foo";
    import {bar} from "foo";
    import {bar, baz} from "foo";
    import {bar as baz} from "foo";
    import {bar as baz, xyz} from "foo";
    
    // glob imports
    import * as foo from "foo";
    
    // mixing imports
    import foo, {baz as xyz} from "foo";
    import foo, * as bar from "foo";
    
    // just import
    import "foo";
    

    Source.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 10:13

    Both of these are valid.

    Method 1 provides named exports. The key here is that you can export more than one thing. This should be used instead of exporting an object with multiple properties. When you import a module with named exports, use import {a, b} from c.

    Method 2 provides the default export. There can be only one default export. This is primarily used when you are exporting a single thing, like a class, or a single function that you expect to be used without any additional support. When you import a module with a default export, use import d from c.

    Note that you can use both! so if you have a major, primary function with a handful of occasionally used helpers, you can export the helpers, and export default the primary. When you import a module and need both kinds of exports, use import d, {a, b} from c.

    One other option is that you can get named exports by listing them at the end of your module, like so: export {a,b,c}. You can also rename them export {a as $a, b as c}.

    I got all of this from this article, which is the best source for up-to-date es6 module information that I've been able to find.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 10:31
    1. Are both of these valid?

    No, export function () { return answer; }; is invalid, either you use default, or you add a name to that function declaration.

    1. If so, why do they both exist?

    They don't :)

    1. Are there other valid options for module exports using ES6 syntax?

    You can see a lot of valid options here: https://github.com/eslint/espree/pull/43

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题