We know that calling Rf_error()
should be avoided in Rcpp as it involves a longjmp over C++ destructors on the stack. This is why we rather throw C++ exceptions in
One of the solutions I came up with involves calling the R's warning
function from Rcpp:
// [[Rcpp::export]]
void test() {
Test t;
Function warning("warning");
warning("test"); // here R errors are caught and transformed to C++ exceptions
}
which gives the correct behavior if warn>2
:
start
end
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : (converted from warning) test
I wonder if anybody has a better idea for that.
I would recommend using stop()
(which is a wrapper around try/catch
) instead:
With your code slightly modified:
#include <Rcpp.h>
using namespace Rcpp;
class Test {
public:
Test() { Rcout << "start\n"; }
~Test() { Rcout << "end\n"; }
};
// [[Rcpp::export]]
void test() {
Test t;
Rf_warning("test");
}
// [[Rcpp::export]]
void test2() {
Test t;
stop("test2");
}
/*** R
options(warn=10)
#test()
test2()
*/
I get the desired behaviour:
R> sourceCpp("/tmp/throw.cpp")
R> options(warn=10)
R> #test()
R> test2()
start
end
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) (from srcConn#3) : test2
R>
The longjmp
issue is known, but you do not win by avoiding the mechanisms we have to unwind objects.