I have read some articles about microservices architecture, but no one takes the topic of transaction. All that they says that this is hard to do it. Maybe someone can describe
Building on top of previous answers, distributed transactions are the solution. In my opinion you don't want to build your own mechanisms for tracking global transactional state, rather you want to use some kind of product - there are several out there. I have written a lengthy blog article about solving this issue with a Java application server:
http://blog.maxant.co.uk/pebble/2015/08/04/1438716480000.html
The best design is having isolated services: each service just do its work within its own transaction and your workflow expects failures on the single service.
If you really need to commit only if all the services are called without errors you should create an higher level service that perform those calls inside an external transaction.
The first raw thing which came to my mind after reading this question is to create every add api with a delete api with ,lets say, an extra boolean flag delFlag.
boolean flag delFlag;
For POST, it will be 0. For DELETE, it will be 1.
Now you maintain a Transaction Manager which is a super service to all your micro services. In this service maintain the calling queue of all the services and the APIs. As and when a service fails, get the calling api and call the delete method of that service and undone whatever u have done.
PS- Just a raw thought. Correct me if you think it is wrong.
I may not be the ultimate expert in this, but I'm sure you're heading towards the Distributed Transactions. In order to have them running, all the application service components need a common shared transaction id, and you have to make sure that every component is informed about the state of the transaction. It is asynchronous, so you'll require substantial prog skills.
Here are distributed transactions mentioned or discussed:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_transaction
http://contino.co.uk/microservices-not-a-free-lunch/
http://martinfowler.com/articles/microservices.html
It would seem people try to avoid it as it is difficult. Maybe that's why you don't find much about.
Hope this helps a step forward :-)
two-phase commit can be option.Coordinator send commit request message to cohorts.Cohorts send back ok.After then coordinator sends commit message to cohorts.If any failure happpens coordinator sends rollback messages to cohorts.
You can use a workflow engine(like JBPM,Activiti) to orchestrate the logic and handle transaction failures or compensatory transactions in it to achieve data integrity. This is the similar case you use in SOA architecture with ESB,BPMN and Web services