Using int as a type parameter for java.util.Dictionary

Question

When I try to declare a Dictionary as such:

private Dictionary map;

The compiler gives me the following error:

Answer 1

To expand on TofuBeer's answer.

int is a primitive

Integer is an Object.

Generics does not support primitives.

Answer 2

In Java primitives aren't objects, so you can't use them in place of objects. However Java will automatically box/unbox primitives (aka autoboxing) into objects so you can do things like:

List<Integer> intList = new LinkedList<Integer>();
intList.add(1);
intList.add(new Integer(2));
...
Integer first = intList.get(0);
int second = intList.get(1);

But this is really just the compiler automatically converting types for you.

Answer 3

In .Net, "primitive" types are backed by objects. In Java, there's a hard distinction between primitive types and Objects. Java 5 introduced autoboxing, which can coerce between the two in certain situations. However, because the Java generics system uses type-erasure, there isn't enough information to autobox in this case.

Answer 4

Java collections only allow references not primitives. You need to use the wrapper classes (in this case java.lang.Integer) to do what you are after:

private Dictionary<String, Integer> map;

they you can do things like:

int foo = map.get("hello");

and

map.put("world", 42);

and Java uses autoboxing/unboxing to deal with the details of the conversion for you.

Here is a little description on it.

Answer 5

@XmlJavaTypeAdapter(value=MyAdapter.class, type=int.class)

Thats the trick specify type to make it work with primitives

In your adapter

using the same in package-info will mean you do it globally for that package

Found this after experimenting.

public class MyAdapter extends XmlAdapter<String, Integer> {

Answer 6

Because in Java the primitives are truely primitives. In Java int will pass by value, while Integer will pass a reference. In .NET int or Int32 etc. are just different names.