I have a following model:
coxph(Surv(fulength, mortality == 1) ~ pspline(predictor))
where is fulength is a duration of follow-up (including mo
This is when you get when you run the first example in ?cph of the rms-package:
n <- 1000
set.seed(731)
age <- 50 + 12*rnorm(n)
label(age) <- "Age"
sex <- factor(sample(c('Male','Female'), n,
rep=TRUE, prob=c(.6, .4)))
cens <- 15*runif(n)
h <- .02*exp(.04*(age-50)+.8*(sex=='Female'))
dt <- -log(runif(n))/h
label(dt) <- 'Follow-up Time'
e <- ifelse(dt <= cens,1,0)
dt <- pmin(dt, cens)
units(dt) <- "Year"
dd <- datadist(age, sex)
options(datadist='dd')
S <- Surv(dt,e)
f <- cph(S ~ rcs(age,4) + sex, x=TRUE, y=TRUE)
cox.zph(f, "rank") # tests of PH
anova(f)
plot(Predict(f, age, sex)) # plot age effect, 2 curves for 2 sexes
Because the rms/Hmisc package combo uses lattice plots, annotation with a marginal age-density feature would need to be done with lattice-functions. On the other hand, if you want to change the response value to relative hazard you can just add a 'fun=exp' argument to the Predict call and relable the graph to get:
png(); plot(Predict(f, age, sex, fun=exp), ylab="Relative Hazard");dev.off()