NULL vs Empty when dealing with user input

Question

Yes, another NULL vs empty string question.

I agree with the idea that NULL means not set, while empty string means \"a value that is empty\". Here\'s my problem: If the

Answer 1

I've never, ever had a use for a NULL value in production code. An empty string is a fine sentinel value for a blank name field, phone number, or annual income for any application. That said, I'm sure you could find some use for it, but I just think it's overused. If I were to use a NULL value, however, I imagine I'd use it anywhere I want to represent an empty value.

Answer 2

I have always used NULL for uninitialized values, empty for purposely empty values and 0 for off indicators.

By doing this all the time, it is there even if I am not using it, but I don't have to do anything different if I need that distinction.

I am usually testing for empty(), but sometimes I check for isset() which evaluates false on NULL. This is useful for reminders to answer certain questions. If it is empty, false or 0 then the question is answered.

Answer 3

I almost never use NULL when referring to actual data. When used for foreign keys, I would say that NULL is valid, but it is almost never valid for user entered data. The one exception that would probably come up quite regularly is for dates that don't exist, such as an employee database with a "termination_date" field. In that case, all current employees should have a value of NULL in that field. As for getting them to actually enter a null value, for the values that truly require a null value, I would put a checkbox next to the input field so that the user can check it on and off to see the corresponding value to null (or in a more user friendly manner, none). When enabling the checkbox to set the field to null, the corresponding text box should be disabled, and if a null value is already associated, it should start out as disabled, and only become enabled once the user unchecks the null checkbox.

Answer 4

I'll break the pattern, and say that I would always use NULL for zero-length strings, for the following reasons.

1. If you start fine-slicing the implications of blanks, then you must ensure somehow that every other developer reads and writes it the same way.

2. How do you alphabetize it?

3. Can you unambiguously determine when a user omitted entering a value, compared with intentionally leaving it blank?

4. How would you unambiguously query for the difference? Can a query screen user indicate NULL vs. blank using standard input form syntax?

5. In practice, I've never been prohibited from reading and writing data using default, unsurprising behavior using this rule. If I've needed to know the difference, I've used a boolean field (which is easier to map to unambiguous UI devices). In one case, I used a trigger to enforce True => null value, but never saw it invoked because the BR layer filtered out the condition effectively.

Answer 5

What you need to do is figure out what behavior you want. There is no one fixed algebra of how name strings are interpreted.

Think about the state machine here: you have fields which have several states: it slounds like you're thinking about a state of "unitialized", another of "purposefully empty" and a third with some set value. ANYTHING you do that makes that assignment and is consistent with the rest of your program will be find; it sounds like the easy mapping is

NULL → uninitialized
"" → purposefully unset
a name → initialized.

Answer 6

If the user provides an empty string, I always treat it as null from the database perspective. In addition, I will typically trim my string inputs to remove leading/trailing spaces and then check for empty. It's a small win in the database with varchar() types and it also reduces the cases for search since I only need to check for name is null instead of name is null or name = '' You could also go the other way, converting null to ''. Either way, choose a way and be consistent.