The goal is to produce the following XML with JAXB
string data
binary data
Is there a reason you don't simply construct a String with your byte[]? Do you truly need a generic?
I couldn't get @XmlValue
working as I always got NullPointerException
along the way—not sure why. I came up with something like the following instead.
Drop your Bar
class entirely, because, as you want it to be able to contain anything you can simply represent it with Object
.
@XmlRootElement(name = "foo", namespace = "http://test.com")
@XmlType(name = "Foo", namespace = "http://test.com")
public class Foo {
@XmlElement(name = "bar")
public List<Object> bars = new ArrayList<>();
public Foo() {}
}
Without telling JAXB which namespaces your types are using every bar
element inside a foo
would contain separate namespace declarations and stuff—the package-info.java
and all the namespace stuff serves only fancification purposes only.
@XmlSchema(attributeFormDefault = XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED,
elementFormDefault = XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED,
namespace = "http://test.com",
xmlns = {
@XmlNs(namespaceURI = "http://test.com", prefix = ""),
@XmlNs(namespaceURI = "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance", prefix = "xsi"),
@XmlNs(namespaceURI = "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema", prefix = "xs")})
package test;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlNs;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlNsForm;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlSchema;
Running this simple test would spout-out something similar to your XML snippet.
public static void main(String[] args) throws JAXBException {
JAXBContext context = JAXBContext.newInstance(Foo.class);
Foo foo = new Foo();
foo.bars.add("a");
foo.bars.add("b".getBytes());
Marshaller marshaller = context.createMarshaller();
marshaller.setProperty(Marshaller.JAXB_FORMATTED_OUTPUT, Boolean.TRUE);
marshaller.marshal(foo, System.out);
}
Output:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<foo xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="http://test.com" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<bar xsi:type="xs:string">a</bar>
<bar xsi:type="xs:base64Binary">Yg==</bar>
</foo>
The trick I'm usually using is to create schema with types you want and then use xjc to generate Java classes and see how annotations are used. :) I believe in XML schema proper type mapping for byte[] is 'base64Binary', so creating schema like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="http://www.example.org/NewXMLSchema" xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/NewXMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified">
<element name="aTest" type="base64Binary"></element>
</schema>
and running xjc we would get following code generated:
@XmlElementDecl(namespace = "http://www.example.org/NewXMLSchema", name = "aTest")
public JAXBElement<byte[]> createATest(byte[] value) {
return new JAXBElement<byte[]>(_ATest_QNAME, byte[].class, null, ((byte[]) value));
}
You could leverage an XmlAdapter
for this use case instead of @XmlValue
:
BarAdapter
package forum8807296;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.adapters.XmlAdapter;
public class BarAdapter extends XmlAdapter<Object, Bar<?>> {
@Override
public Bar<?> unmarshal(Object v) throws Exception {
if(null == v) {
return null;
}
Bar<Object> bar = new Bar<Object>();
bar.setValue(v);
return bar;
}
@Override
public Object marshal(Bar<?> v) throws Exception {
if(null == v) {
return null;
}
return v.getValue();
}
}
Foo
The XmlAdapter
is associated with the bars
property using the @XmlJavaTypeAdapter
annotation:
package forum8807296;
import java.util.List;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.*;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.adapters.XmlJavaTypeAdapter;
@XmlRootElement
public class Foo {
private List<Bar> bars;
@XmlElement(name="bar")
@XmlJavaTypeAdapter(BarAdapter.class)
public List<Bar> getBars() {
return bars;
}
public void setBars(List<Bar> bars) {
this.bars = bars;
}
}
Bar
package forum8807296;
public class Bar<T> {
private T value;
public T getValue() {
return value;
}
public void setValue(T value) {
this.value = value;
}
}
Demo
You can test this example using the following demo code:
package forum8807296;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import javax.xml.bind.JAXBContext;
import javax.xml.bind.Marshaller;
public class Demo {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
JAXBContext jc = JAXBContext.newInstance(Foo.class);
Foo foo = new Foo();
List<Bar> bars = new ArrayList<Bar>();
foo.setBars(bars);
Bar<String> stringBar = new Bar<String>();
stringBar.setValue("string data");
bars.add(stringBar);
Bar<byte[]> binaryBar = new Bar<byte[]>();
binaryBar.setValue("binary data".getBytes());
bars.add(binaryBar);
Marshaller marshaller = jc.createMarshaller();
marshaller.setProperty(Marshaller.JAXB_FORMATTED_OUTPUT, true);
marshaller.marshal(foo, System.out);
}
}
Output
Note how the output includes the xsi:type
attributes to preserve the type of the value. You can eliminate the the xsi:type
attribute by having your XmlAdapter
return String
instead of Object
, if you do this you will need handle the conversion from String
to the appropriate type yourself for the unmarshal operation:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<foo>
<bar xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:type="xs:string">string data</bars>
<bar xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:type="xs:base64Binary">YmluYXJ5IGRhdGE=</bars>
</foo>