How to differentiate between method and function in a decorator?

前端 未结 4 1072
感情败类
感情败类 2021-02-06 02:38

I want to write a decorator that acts differently depending on whether it is applied to a function or to a method.

def some_decorator(func):
    if the_magic_hap         


        
相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2021-02-06 02:47

    Do you need to have the magic happen where you choose which wrapper to return, or can you defer the magic until the function is actually called? You could always try a parameter to your decorator to indicate which of the two wrappers it should use, like

    def some_decorator( clams ):
       def _mydecor(func ):
           @wraps(func)
           def wrapping(*args....)
              ...
           return wrapping
       def _myclassdecor(func):
           @wraps(func)
           .....
    
       return _mydecor if clams else _myclassdecor
    

    The other thing that I might suggest is to create a metaclass and define the init method in the metaclass to look for methods decorated with your decorator and revise them accordingly, like Alex hinted at. Use this metaclass with your base class, and since all the classes that will use the decorator will inherit from the base class, they'll also get the metaclass type and use its init as well.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-06 02:50

    From Python 3.3 onwards by using PEP 3155:

    def some_decorator(func):
        if func.__name__ != func.__qualname__:
            print 'Yay, found a method ^_^ (unbound jet)'
        else:
            print 'Meh, just an ordinary function :/'
        return func
    

    A method x of class A will have a __qualname__ that is A.x while a function x will have a __qualname__ of x.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-06 02:58

    You just need to check to see if the function being decorated has an im_func attribute. If it does, then it is a method. If it doesn't then it is a function.

    Note that the code sample below does the detection at call time but you can do it at decoration time as well. Just move the hasattr check to the outer decorator generator.

    Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Dec  7 2009, 18:45:15) 
    [GCC 4.4.1] on linux2
    Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
    >>> def deco(f):
    ...   def _wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
    ...     if hasattr(f, 'im_func'):
    ...       print 'method'
    ...     else:
    ...       print 'function'
    ...   return _wrapper
    ... 
    >>> deco(lambda x: None)()
    function
    >>> def f(x):
    ...   return x + 5
    ... 
    >>> deco(f)()
    function
    >>> class A:
    ...   def f(self, x):
    ...     return x + 5
    ... 
    >>> a = A()
    >>> deco(a.f)()
    method
    >>> deco(A.f)()
    method
    >>> 
    

    Edit

    Oh snap! And I get it totally wrong. I so should have read Alex's post more thoroughly.

    >>> class B:
    ...   @deco
    ...   def f(self, x):
    ...     return x +5
    ... 
    >>> b = B()
    >>> b.f()
    function
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-06 03:08

    I would rely on the convention that functions that will become methods have a first argument named self, and other functions don't. Fragile, but then, there's no really solid way.

    So (pseudocode as I have comments in lieu of what you want to do in either case...):

    import inspect
    import functools
    
    def decorator(f):
      args = inspect.getargspec(f)
      if args and args[0] == 'self':
         # looks like a (future) method...
      else:
         # looks like a "real" function
         @functools.wraps(f)
         def wrapper  # etc etc
    

    One way to make it a bit more solid, as you say all classes involved inherit from a class under your control, is to have that class provide a metaclass (which will also of course be inherited by said classes) which checks things at the end of the class body. Make the wrapped function accessible e.g. by wrapper._f = f and the metaclass's __init__ can check that all wrapped methods did indeed have self as the first argument.

    Unfortunately there's no easy way to check that other functions (non-future-methods) being wrapped didn't have such a first argument, since you're not in control of the environment in that case. The decorator might check for "top-level" functions (ones whose def is a top-level statement in their module), via the f_globals (globals dict, i.e., module's dict) and f_name attributes of the function -- if the function's such a global presumably it won't later be assigned as an attribute of the class (thereby becoming a future-method anyway;-) so the self named first arg, if there, can be diagnosed as wrong and warned about (while still treating the function as a real function;-).

    One alternative would be to do the decoration in the decorator itself under the hypothesis of a real function, but also make available the original function object as wrapper._f. Then, the metaclass's __init__ can re-do the decoration for all functions in the class body that it sees have been marked this way. This approach is much more solid than the convention-relying one I just sketched, even with the extra checks. Still, something like

    class Foo(Bar): ... # no decorations
    
    @decorator
    def f(*a, **k): ...
    
    Foo.f = f   # "a killer"... function becomes method!
    

    would still be problematic -- you could try intercepting this with a __setattr__ in your metaclass (but then other assignments to class attributes after the class statement can become problematic).

    The more the user's code has freedom to do funky things (and Python generally leaves the programmer a lot of such freedom), the harder time your "framework-y" code has keeping things under tight control instead, of course;-).

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题