Best way to use c++ code from R package FOO in package BAR

后端 未结 3 736
星月不相逢
星月不相逢 2021-02-06 01:20

I am trying to define a function using Rcpp for speedup. The situation is as follows:

  • I have a package FOO with a lot of C++ code (my own package and currently not
相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-02-06 02:00

    Another option, in case you don't mind introducing Rcpp into package FOO - follow along with Section 3.5 of Rcpp-attributes and do the following:

    1. Place // [[Rcpp::interfaces(cpp)]] at the top of the .cpp source files containing functions you'd like to be made available to other packages,

    2. Place // [[Rcpp::export]] in front of those functions you would like exported,

    3. Call compileAttributes() in the package directory of FOO to generate files in inst/include that can then be used by package BAR, using // [[Rcpp::depends(FOO)]],

    4. Install package FOO.

    If you have this set up correctly, you should be able to call a function with a template like this (supposing foo_a is an exported function from FOO):

    // [[Rcpp::depends(FOO)]]
    
    #include <Rcpp.h>
    #include <FOO.h>
    using namespace Rcpp;
    
    // [[Rcpp::export]]
    SEXP some_function() {
      return FOO::foo_a();
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-06 02:18

    I would recommend one of these options:

    If foo_a and foo_b are simple enough, just have them as inline functions in headers of FOO and put these headers in FOO/inst/include/FOO.h. Rcpp::depends(FOO) will then include this file when you invoke compileAttributes (or perhaps load_all) on BAR.

    Otherwise, consider registering the functions using R's registration model. this is a bit more work, but that's bearable. Writing R extensions has the details. I would suggest putting all the registration logic in FOO so that the client package BAR only has to use it. For example, I'd have foo_a like this in FOO's headers, e.g. in FOO/inst/include/FOO.h:

    #ifdef COMPILING_FOO
    inline int foo_a(int x, double y, const std::string& z){
        typedef int (*Fun)(int, double, const std::string&) ;
        static Fun fun = (Fun)R_GetCCallable( "FOO", "foo_a" ) ;
        return fun(x,y,z) ;
    }
    #else 
    // just declare it
    int foo_a(int x, double y, const std::string& z) ;
    #endif
    

    and the actual definition of foo_a in some .cpp file in FOO/src:

    #define COMPILING_FOO
    #include <FOO.h>
    
    int foo_a(int x, double y, const std::string& z){
       // do stuff
    }
    

    Then, you need to register foo_a using R_RegisterCCallable in the function R_init_FOO:

    extern "C" void R_init_FOO( DllInfo* info ){
        R_RegisterCCallable( "FOO", "foo_a", (DL_FUNC)foo_a );
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-06 02:20

    The RcppXts package does just that for a bunch of functions from the well-known xts package.

    Edit: Here is some code from xts.

    First, xts::src/init.c does the registration via a dozen or so declarations like

    R_RegisterCCallable("xts","do_is_ordered",(DL_FUNC) &do_is_ordered);
    

    Second, xts::inst/include/xtsApi.h provides a header for client packages with eg

    SEXP attribute_hidden xtsIsOrdered(SEXP x, SEXP increasing, SEXP strictly) {
        static SEXP(*fun)(SEXP,SEXP,SEXP) = NULL;
        fun = (SEXP(*)(SEXP,SEXP,SEXP)) R_GetCCallable("xts","do_is_ordered");
        return fun(x, increasing, strictly);
    }
    

    Third, in a client package such as RcppXts we define this (using Rcpp Modules) as

    function("xtsIsOrdered",
             &xtsIsOrdered,
             List::create(Named("x"),
                          Named("increasing") = true,
                          Named("strictly") = true),
             "Tests whether object is (strictly) (increasing) ordered");
    

    which exposes it to R. We could equally well call the C function xtsIsOrdered from C++ code.

    I removed the incorrect earlier comment that functions have to conform to 'SEXP in, SEXP out'.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题