HashSet that preserves ordering

后端 未结 3 1358
滥情空心
滥情空心 2020-11-27 05:30

I need a HashSet that preserves insertion ordering, are there any implementations of this in the framework?

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2020-11-27 05:38

    You can get this functionality easily using KeyedCollection<TKey,TItem> specifying the same type argument for TKey and TItem:

    public class OrderedHashSet<T> : KeyedCollection<T, T>
    {
        protected override T GetKeyForItem(T item)
        {
            return item;
        }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 05:41

    If you need constant complexity of Add, Remove, Contains and order preservation, then there's no such collection in .NET Framework 4.5.

    If you're okay with 3rd party code, take a look at my repository (permissive MIT license): https://github.com/OndrejPetrzilka/Rock.Collections

    There's OrderedHashSet<T> collection:

    • based on classic HashSet<T> source code (from .NET Core)
    • preserves order of insertions and allows manual reordering
    • features reversed enumeration
    • has same operation complexities as HashSet<T>
    • Add and Remove operations are 20% slower compared to HashSet<T>
    • consumes 8 more bytes of memory per item
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 05:50

    Standard .NET HashSet do not preserve the insertion order. For simple tests the insertion order may be preserved due to an accident, but it's not guaranteed and would not always work that way. To prove that it is enough to do some removals in between.

    See this question for more information on that: Does HashSet preserve insertion order?

    I have briefly implemented a HashSet which guarantees insertion order. It uses the Dictionary to look up items and the LinkedList to preserve order. All three insertion, removal and lookup work still in O(1).

    public class OrderedSet<T> : ICollection<T>
    {
        private readonly IDictionary<T, LinkedListNode<T>> m_Dictionary;
        private readonly LinkedList<T> m_LinkedList;
    
        public OrderedSet()
            : this(EqualityComparer<T>.Default)
        {
        }
    
        public OrderedSet(IEqualityComparer<T> comparer)
        {
            m_Dictionary = new Dictionary<T, LinkedListNode<T>>(comparer);
            m_LinkedList = new LinkedList<T>();
        }
    
        public int Count
        {
            get { return m_Dictionary.Count; }
        }
    
        public virtual bool IsReadOnly
        {
            get { return m_Dictionary.IsReadOnly; }
        }
    
        void ICollection<T>.Add(T item)
        {
            Add(item);
        }
    
        public bool Add(T item)
        {
            if (m_Dictionary.ContainsKey(item)) return false;
            LinkedListNode<T> node = m_LinkedList.AddLast(item);
            m_Dictionary.Add(item, node);
            return true;
        }
    
        public void Clear()
        {
            m_LinkedList.Clear();
            m_Dictionary.Clear();
        }
    
        public bool Remove(T item)
        {
            LinkedListNode<T> node;
            bool found = m_Dictionary.TryGetValue(item, out node);
            if (!found) return false;
            m_Dictionary.Remove(item);
            m_LinkedList.Remove(node);
            return true;
        }
    
        public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator()
        {
            return m_LinkedList.GetEnumerator();
        }
    
        IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
        {
            return GetEnumerator();
        }
    
        public bool Contains(T item)
        {
            return m_Dictionary.ContainsKey(item);
        }
    
        public void CopyTo(T[] array, int arrayIndex)
        {
            m_LinkedList.CopyTo(array, arrayIndex);
        }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题