I was reading up on Django bulk_create and a few of its \"flaws\":
\"
This has a number of caveats though:
1. The model\'s save() method will not be called, and
Try setting the ids manually. To prevent race conditions, make sure to wrap the function as a single transaction.
from django.db import transaction, models
@transaction.commit_on_success
def bulk_create_with_manual_ids(foo_list):
id_start = (Foo.objects.all().aggregate(models.Max('id'))['id__max'] or 0) + 1
for i,foo in enumerate(foo_list): foo.id = id_start + i
return Foo.objects.bulk_create(foo_list)
objList = [Foo(),Foo(),Foo()]
foo_objects = bulk_create_with_manual_ids(objList)
Bar(foo=foo_objects[0]).save()
Note that this approach is unsuitable for any table that has a serial
field or other auto-incrementing in-database generated key. The key will not be incremented by the bulk create since IDs are being generated on the Django side.
For the first question, no you won't be able to do that, because obj
won't have its primary key set so couldn't be used as a foreign key.
The second question, no that's not what it says at all. It specifically mentions "multi-table inheritance": inheriting from an abstract model is not multi-table inheritance.