In a job interview, I was asked to write a metafunction that determined whether a type was a pointer. This is what I presented:
template
struc
There are different approaches, a common one trying to typedef an invalid type:
#define static_assert(condition) \
typedef char assert ## __LINE__ [((condition)?1:-1)]
This can be used in mostly any context and will trip the compiler if the condition is false, since it would try to typedef an invalid type (array of negative number of elements). It can be used in different contexts:
// namespace level:
static_assert(sizeof(int)==4);
struct type {
// class level:
static_assert(sizeof(int)==4);
void f() {
// function level
static_assert(sizeof(int)==4);
}
};
I would use BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT. You can look at the code: boost/static_assert.hpp.
Here's a very simplified version, just to give you an idea:
#define JOIN(X, Y) DO_JOIN(X, Y)
#define DO_JOIN(X, Y) X ## Y
template<bool cond>
struct Static_assert_helper; // incomplete type
template<>
struct Static_assert_helper<true> {
typedef int Type;
};
#define STATIC_ASSERT(cond) \
typedef Static_assert_helper<(cond)>::Type JOIN(Static_assert_typedef_, __LINE__)
It can be used in many places (see the documentation for examples).
(Boost's implementation is more complete, with e.g. a sizeof
and an intermediate struct, to give a better error message and be portable on a wide range of compilers.)
In your case
template <bool> struct assert;
template <> struct assert<true> {};
would have solved the problem:
assert<!is_pointer<char>::value>(); // valid
assert<is_pointer<char *>::value>(); // valid
assert<is_pointer<char>::value>(); // compilation error:
// use of incomplete class