The nullptr and pointer arithmetic

Question

Considering the following code, is it safe to do pointer arithmetic on nullptr?

I assume adding any offsets to a nullptr results in another

Answer 1

You didn't define what "safe" means to you, but regardless, the code you propose has undefined behaviour. Pointer arithmetic is only allowed on pointer values that point into an array object, or perhaps to one-past-the-end of an array. (Non-array objects are considered an array of one element for the purpose of this rule.)

Since the null pointer is never the address of an object or one past an object, your code can never have well-defined behaviour.

Answer 2

... is it safe to do pointer arithmetic on nullptr?

No, arithmetic on the nullptr is not well defined since it is itself not a pointer type (but conversions to NULL values of all pointer types exist).

See here;

std::nullptr_t is the type of the null pointer literal, nullptr. It is a distinct type that is not itself a pointer type or a pointer to member type.

---

In general, arbitrary pointer arithmetic (even on the NULL value) is almost certainly going to cause problems - you didn't allocate that memory - it is not yours to attempt to read or write to.

For comparison purposes (e.g. one past the end), you will be fine, but otherwise the code you have will result in undefined behaviour.

For further reading, see Wikipedia on undefined behavior.

Answer 3

No, adding an offset to a nullptr does not result in a nullptr. This is undefined behavior.

Answer 4

is it safe to do pointer arithmetic on nullptr? 

C++ defines two kind of operations on nullptr. For :

float * x=nullptr;
float * y=nullptr;

1. x +/- 0 = x

2. x-y=0 //note x and y have the same type

You cannot make an assumption about what is not defined, so you shouldn't do it.