How to split and dispatch an async control-flow using Continuations?

后端 未结 3 776
南旧
南旧 2021-02-05 15:17

I have an asynchronous control-flow like the following:

ActorA ! DoA(dataA, callback1, callbackOnErrorA)

def callback1() = {
  ...
  ActorB ! DoB(dataB, callbac         


        
相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-02-05 15:59

    See Akka's Futures and how to compose them or scalaz's Promises, they are nearly the same, there are only slight differences.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 16:17

    This is very simplified, but shows how to split up a single control flow among three actors, passing the state along to each:

    package blevins.example
    
    import scala.continuations._
    import scala.continuations.ControlContext._
    import scala.actors.Actor._
    import scala.actors._
    
    object App extends Application {
    
      val actorA, actorB, actorC = actor {
        receive {
          case f: Function1[Unit,Unit] => { f() }
        }
      }
    
      def handle(a: Actor) = shift { k: (Unit=>Unit) =>
        a ! k
      }
    
      // Control flow to split up
      reset {
          // this is not handled by any actor
          var x = 1
          println("a: " + x)
    
          handle(actorA)  // actorA handles the below
          x += 4
          println("b: " + x)
    
          handle(actorB) // then, actorB handles the rest
          var y = 2
          x += 2
          println("c: " + x)
    
          handle(actorC) // and so on...
          y += 1
          println("d: " + x + ":" + y)
      }
    
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 16:23

    I like to use scalaz.concurrent.Promise. This example isn't exactly like the one in your question, but it gives you the idea.

    object Async extends Application {
      import scalaz._
      import Scalaz._
      import concurrent._
      import concurrent.strategy._
      import java.util.concurrent.{ExecutorService, Executors}
    
      case class ResultA(resultb: ResultB, resulta: ResultC)
      case class ResultB()
      case class ResultC()
    
      run
    
      def run {
        implicit val executor: ExecutorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(8)
        import Executor.strategy
    
        val promiseA = doA
        println("waiting for results")
        val a: ResultA = promiseA.get
        println("got " + a)
        executor.shutdown    
      }
    
      def doA(implicit s: Strategy[Unit]): Promise[ResultA] = {
        println("triggered A")
        val b = doB
        val c = doC
        for {bb <- b; cc <- c} yield ResultA(bb, cc)
      }
    
      def doB(implicit s: Strategy[Unit]): Promise[ResultB] = {
        println("triggered B")
        promise { Thread.sleep(1000); println("returning B"); ResultB() }
      }
    
      def doC(implicit s: Strategy[Unit]): Promise[ResultC] = {
        println("triggered C")
        promise { Thread.sleep(1000); println("returning C"); ResultC() }
      }
    }
    

    Output:

    triggered A
    triggered B
    triggered C
    waiting for results
    returning B
    returning C
    got ResultA(ResultB(),ResultC())
    

    You'll find an introduction to Scalaz concurrency in this presentation from Runar.

    This approach isn't as flexible as Actors, but composes better and can't deadlock.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题