How to call a method a.s.a.p. but at earliest in the next run loop iteration?

后端 未结 4 1419
广开言路
广开言路 2021-02-05 10:16

I need a save way to say: \"iOS, I want this method to be executed a.s.a.p., but NOT in THIS run loop iteration. At the earliest in the next, but please not in this one. Thank y

相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2021-02-05 10:41

    I think you conclusion from reading the documentation is wrong.

    So basically it can happen that the method gets called immediately as if I had just sent a direct message

    No. The part of the documentation you quote says that the selector is always queued on the run loop, no matter what. So it will never be executed just as a direct message.

    The first sentence with the "not necessarily" might be a bit misleading, but I think the second sentence should really clarify that what you fear is not gong to happen.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 10:43

    Quite trivial using GCD (Grand Central Dispatch):

    dispatch_async (dispatch_get_main_queue (), ^{
        NSLog (@"This stuff runs in the next iteration of the main run loop");
    });
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 10:48

    Surely you just do this;

    [self doSomeOtherThings];
    [self performSelector:@selector(doSomethingInNextRunLoop) withObject:nil afterDelay:0];
    

    Which guarantees the execution order you want.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 10:50

    If you're worried that Apple may someday special-case a delay of 0, you could always specify a delay of 1e-37 or so. Although the documentation for performSelector:withObject:afterDelay: could easily be read to guarantee that the selector will always be scheduled for the next run loop iteration.

    If you're worried that Apple may someday special-case delays less than some arbitrary lower bound, you could always try using NSRunLoop's performSelector:target:argument:order:modes: which the documentation specifically states will schedule execution for the next iteration of the run loop.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题