In Ruby, what is the most expressive way to map an array in such a way that certain elements are modified and the others left untouched?
This is a straight-forw
If you don't need the old array, I prefer map! in this case because you can use the ! method to represent you are changing the array in place.
self.answers.map!{ |x| (x=="b" ? x+"!" : x) }
I prefer this over:
new_map = self.old_map{ |x| (x=="b" ? x+"!" : x) }
Ruby 2.7+
As of 2.7 there's a definitive answer.
Ruby 2.7 is introducing filter_map
for this exact purpose. It's idiomatic and performant, and I'd expect it to become the norm very soon.
For example:
numbers = [1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 13]
enum.filter_map { |i| i * 2 if i.even? }
# => [4, 16, 20]
Here's a good read on the subject.
Hope that's useful to someone!
Your map
solution is the best one. I'm not sure why you think map_modifying_only_elements_where is somehow better. Using map
is cleaner, more concise, and doesn't require multiple blocks.
I've found that the best way to accomplish this is by using tap
arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
[].tap do |a|
arr.each { |x| a << x if x%2==0 }
end
One liner:
["a", "b", "c"].inject([]) { |cumulative, i| i == "b" ? (cumulative << "#{i}!") : cumulative }
In the code above, you start with [] "cumulative". As you enumerate through an Enumerator (in our case the array, ["a", "b", "c"]), cumulative as well as "the current" item get passed to our block (|cumulative, i|) and the result of our block's execution is assigned to cumulative. What I do above is keep cumulative unchanged when the item isn't "b" and append "b!" to cumulative array and return it when it is a b.
There is an answer above that uses select
, which is the easiest way to do (and remember) it.
You can combine select
with map
in order to achieve what you're looking for:
arr = ["a", "b", "c"].select { |i| i == "b" }.map { |i| "#{i}!" }
=> ["b!"]
Inside the select
block, you specify the conditions for an element to be "selected". This will return an array. You can call "map" on the resulting array to append the exclamation mark to it.
I agree that the map statement is good as it is. It's clear and simple,, and would easy for anyone to maintain.
If you want something more complex, how about this?
module Enumerable
def enum_filter(&filter)
FilteredEnumerator.new(self, &filter)
end
alias :on :enum_filter
class FilteredEnumerator
include Enumerable
def initialize(enum, &filter)
@enum, @filter = enum, filter
if enum.respond_to?(:map!)
def self.map!
@enum.map! { |elt| @filter[elt] ? yield(elt) : elt }
end
end
end
def each
@enum.each { |elt| yield(elt) if @filter[elt] }
end
def each_with_index
@enum.each_with_index { |elt,index| yield(elt, index) if @filter[elt] }
end
def map
@enum.map { |elt| @filter[elt] ? yield(elt) : elt }
end
alias :and :enum_filter
def or
FilteredEnumerator.new(@enum) { |elt| @filter[elt] || yield(elt) }
end
end
end
%w{ a b c }.on { |x| x == 'b' }.map { |x| x + "!" } #=> [ 'a', 'b!', 'c' ]
require 'set'
Set.new(%w{ He likes dogs}).on { |x| x.length % 2 == 0 }.map! { |x| x.reverse } #=> #<Set: {"likes", "eH", "sgod"}>
('a'..'z').on { |x| x[0] % 6 == 0 }.or { |x| 'aeiouy'[x] }.to_a.join #=> "aefiloruxy"