What does “out” mean before a Generic type parameter?

前端 未结 4 1984
我寻月下人不归
我寻月下人不归 2021-02-05 07:18

I\'ve just saw an unfamiliar syntax while looking for GroupBy return type:

public interface IGrouping : IEnumerable<         


        
相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2021-02-05 07:46

    out just means that the type is only used for output e.g.

    public interface Foo<out T>
    {
       T Bar()
    }
    

    There also is a modifier in that means that the type is only used for input e.g.

    public interface Foo<in T>
    {
        int Bar(T x)
    }
    

    These are used because Interfaces with in are covariant in T and Interfaces with out are contravariant in T.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 07:48

    It is one of the two generic modifiers introduces in C# 4.0 (Visual Studio 2010).

    It signifies that the generic parameter it is declared on is covariant.

    The in modifier signifies the generic parameter it is declared on is contravariant.

    See out (Generic Modifier) and in (Generic Modifier) on MSDN.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 07:56

    out keyword in this context would indicate the corresponding type parameter to be covariant simply speaking - covariance enables you to use a more derived type than that specified by the generic parameter.

    BTW, see this ten part series from Eric Lippert to understand more about covariance and contra-variance: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2007/10/16/covariance-and-contravariance-in-c-part-one.aspx

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 08:03

    It denotes a covariant parameter. See also the description on MSDN. Essentially it says, that IGrouping<Aderived, Bderived> can be regarded as IGrouping<Abase, Bbase>, hence you can

    IGrouping<Aderived, Bderived> gr = MakeGrouping(...);
    IGrouping<Abase, Bbase> grBase = gr;
    

    if Aderived is an interface or a type derived from Abase. This is a feature that comes in handy when you want to call a method that requires a parameter of type IGrouping<Abase, Bbase>, but you only got an object of type IGrouping<Aderived, Bderived>. In this case, both types can be considered equivalent due to the covariance of their type parameters.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题