Meaningful error message for Clojure.Spec validation in :pre

后端 未结 4 1834
耶瑟儿~
耶瑟儿~ 2021-02-05 06:42

I used the last days to dig deeper into clojure.spec in Clojure and ClojureScript.

Until now I find it most useful, to use specs as guards in :pre

相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2021-02-05 07:09

    I think the idea is that you use spec/instrument to validate function input and output rather than pre and post conditions.

    There's a good example toward the bottom of this blog post: http://gigasquidsoftware.com/blog/2016/05/29/one-fish-spec-fish/ . Quick summary: you can define a spec for a function, including both input and return values using the :args and :ret keys (thus replacing both pre and post conditions), with spec/fdef, instrument it, and you get output similar to using explain when it fails to meet spec.

    Minimal example derived from that link:

    (spec/fdef your-func
        :args even?
        :ret  string?)
    
    
    (spec/instrument #'your-func)
    

    And that's equivalent to putting a precondition that the function has an integer argument and a postcondition that it returns a string. Except you get much more useful errors, just like you're looking for.

    More details in the official guide: https://clojure.org/guides/spec ---see under the heading "Spec'ing functions".

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 07:23

    In newer alphas, there is now s/assert which can be used to assert that an input or return value matches a spec. If valid, the original value is returned. If invalid, an assertion error is thrown with the explain result. Assertions can be turned on or off and can even optionally be omitted from the compiled code entirely to have 0 production impact.

    (s/def ::first-name string?)
    (s/def ::last-name string?)
    (s/def ::person (s/keys :req [::first-name ::last-name]))
    (defn person-name [person]
      (s/assert ::person person)
      (s/assert string? (str (::first-name person) " " (::last-name person))))
    
    (s/check-asserts true)
    
    (person-name 10)
    => CompilerException clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: Spec assertion failed
    val: 10 fails predicate: map?
    :clojure.spec/failure  :assertion-failed
     #:clojure.spec{:problems [{:path [], :pred map?, :val 10, :via [], :in []}], :failure :assertion-failed}
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 07:29

    Without taking into account if you should use pre and post conditions to validate function arguments, there is a way to print somewhat clearer messages from pre and post conditions by wrapping your predicate with clojure.test/is, as suggested in the answer below:

    How can I get Clojure :pre & :post to report their failing value?

    So then your code could look like this:

    (ns pre-post-messages.core
      (:require [clojure.spec :as s]
                [clojure.test :as t]))
    
    (defn person-name [person]
      {:pre [(t/is (s/valid? ::person person))]
       :post [(t/is (s/valid? string? %))]}
      (str (::first-name person) " " (::last-name person)))
    
    (def try-1
      {:first-name "Anna Vissi"})
    
    (def try-2
      {::first-name "Anna"
       ::last-name "Vissi"
       ::email "Anna@Vissi.com"})
    
    (s/def ::person (s/keys :req [::first-name ::last-name ::email]))
    

    Evaluating

    pre-post-messages.core> (person-name  try-2)
    

    would produce

    "Anna Vissi"
    

    and evaluating

    pre-post-messages.core> (person-name  try-1)
    

    would produce

    FAIL in () (core.clj:6)
    
    expected: (s/valid? :pre-post-messages.core/person person)
    
      actual: (not (s/valid? :pre-post-messages.core/person {:first-name "Anna Vissi"}))
    
    AssertionError Assert failed: (t/is (s/valid? :pre-post-messages.core/person person))  pre-post-messages.core/person-name (core.clj:5)
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 07:30

    This is useful when you don't want to use s/assert, or can not enable s/check-assserts. Improving on MicSokoli's answer:

    :pre simply cares that the values returned are all truthy, so we can convert the return value "Success!\n" to true (for strictness) and throw an error with the explanation and the input data in case the output is not successful.

    (defn validate [spec input]
        (let [explanation (s/explain-str spec input)]
            (if (= explanation "Success!\n") 
                true
                (throw (ex-info explanation {:input input}))))
    

    A variation of this could be this one, but it would run the spec twice:

    (defn validate [spec input]
        (if (s/valid? spec input) 
            true
            (throw (ex-info (s/explain spec input) {:input input}))))
    

    Usage:

    (defn person-name [person]
      {:pre [(validate ::person person)]}
      (str (::first-name person) " " (::last-name person)))
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题