Although somewhat experienced with writing Winforms applications, the... \"vagueness\" of WPF still eludes me in terms of best practices and design patterns.
Despite pop
change your binding to
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding Path=TopicList}"
Others have already made useful suggestions (use an observable collection to get list-change notification, make the collection a property rather than a field). Here are two they haven't:
1) Whenever you're having a problem with data binding, look in the Output window to make sure that you're not getting any binding errors. You can spend a lot of time trying to fix the wrong problem if you don't do this.
2) Understand the role change notification plays in binding. Changes in your data source can't and won't get propagated to the UI unless the data source implements change notification. There are two ways to do this for normal properties: make the data source derive from DependencyObject
and make the bound property a dependency property, or make the data source implement INotifyPropertyChanged
and raise the PropertyChanged
event when the property's value changes. When binding an ItemsControl
to a collection, use a collection class that implements INotifyCollectionChanged
(like ObservableCollection<T>
), so that changes to the contents and order of the collection will get propagated to the bound control. (Note that if you want changes to the items in the collection to get propagated to the bound controls, those items need to implement change notification too.)
First you dont need a HeirarchicalDataTemplate for this. Just regular DataTemplate as Aaron has given is enough. Then you need to instantiate the TopicList ObservableCollection somewhere inside the constructor of the class. which makes the ObservableCollection alive even before you add data in to it And binding system knows the collection. Then when you add each and every Topic/CheckedListItem it will automatically shows up in the UI.
TopicList = new ObservableCollection<CheckedListItem>(); //This should happen only once
private void InitializeTopicList( MyDataContext context )
{
TopicList.Clear();
foreach ( Topic topic in topicList )
{
CheckedListItem item = new CheckedListItem();
item.Name = topic.DisplayName;
item.ID = topic.ID;
TopicList.Add( item );
}
}
Use ObservableCollection<Topic>
instead of List<Topic>
Edit
it implements INotifyCollectionChanged interface to let WPF know when you add/remove/modify items
Edit 2
Since you set TopicList
in code, it should be a Dependency Property, not a common field
public ObservableCollection<CheckedListItem> TopicList {
get { return (ObservableCollection<CheckedListItem>)GetValue(TopicListProperty); }
set { SetValue(TopicListProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty TopicListProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("TopicList", typeof(ObservableCollection<CheckedListItem>), typeof(MainWindow), new UIPropertyMetadata(null));
Edit 3
To see changes in items
INotifyPropertyChanged
interface in CheckedListItem
(each setter should call PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(<property name as string>))
event)CheckedListItem
from DependencyObject
, and convert Name
, ID
, IsChecked
to dependency propertiestopicList[0] = new CheckedListItem() { Name = ..., ID = ... }
)Assuming TopicList
is not an ObservableCollection<T>
therefore when you add items no INotifyCollection
changed is being fired to tell the binding engine to update the value.
Change your TopicList
to an ObservableCollection<T>
which will resolve the current issue. You could also populate the List<T>
ahead of time and then the binding will work via OneWay; however ObservableCollection<T>
is a more robust approach.
EDIT:
Your TopicList
needs to be a property not a member variable; bindings require properties. It does not need to be a DependencyProperty
.
EDIT 2:
Modify your ItemTemplate
as it does not need to be a HierarchicalDataTemplate
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel>
<CheckBox Content="{Binding Name}" IsChecked="{Binding IsChecked}"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>