I\'ve come across the following signature
double(&rotate_vec(double(&val)[4]))[4];
In the comments it \"claims\" to accept and
double ( &rotate_vec( double (&val)[4] ) )[4]
A function named rotate_vec
double ( &rotate_vec( double (&val)[4] ) )[4]
...that takes as an argument, a reference to an array of four doubles
double ( &rotate_vec( double (&val)[4] ) )[4]
...and returns a reference to an array of four doubles.
With C++03 the best you can do to simplify the original
double(&rotate_vec(double(&val)[4]))[4];
is to use a typedef
, to wit:
typedef double Four_vec[4];
Four_vec& rotate_vec( Four_vec& val );
In C++11 you can write
auto rotate_vec( double (&val)[4] )
-> double (&)[4];
although I'd use a typedef
or C++11 using
to clarify.
Regarding
“We can't return an array from a function, just pointers, or can we ?”
you can't return a raw array by value, but you can return a pointer or reference, or you can wrap it in a struct, like C++11 std::array
.