I\'m seeking clarification regarding the use of og:type article vs website for an individual web page that is technically not an \"article\" but also does not represent an entir
Website and Blog in facebook would represent the root domain or subdomain, the root non the less.
This was originally designed for the like button social plugin from what i understand, and it was a way to set a hierarchy to the site. "this is facebook specific functionality".
type = social_plugin is what i used to represent my social plugins, i set this in open graph settings for my application. If a type does not exist to represent your page type, then you create one.
anotherfeed.com - website
|
|
|
/widgets/index.php - social_plugin
/?cat=world_news - article
In my experience, the difference between 'article' and 'website' is related to how Facebook uses the 'like'. A 'like' of a page with type website will appear in the section of the user's profile where it lists their likes; a 'like' of a page with type article does not. A user's like of an 'article' object is more likely to be displayed to friends in their newsfeeds (although, as of now, even an article, without a comment, is pretty unlikely to make it into a newsfeed item, unless there are strong reasons-- topic of mutual interest, very frequent interaction between the users-- to make the item surface in Facebook's algorithm).