Prevent direct commits on master branch in git repository and accept merges only?

前端 未结 6 1009
误落风尘
误落风尘 2021-02-05 02:10

My git repository has two branches, \'master\' and \'dev\'.

Code committed to \'dev\' goes through an automated build process before it is tested. Code that passes this

相关标签:
6条回答
  • 2021-02-05 02:30

    If you're using GitHub, they have a feature to protect branches. Go to the GitHub settings for the repository, then branches and see the protected branches settings.

    You can choose which branches you want to protect, and for each branch how you want to protect it. You can just prevent force pushes, require changes to be merged from another branch, or even require that your automated tests have passed.

    See https://help.github.com/articles/defining-the-mergeability-of-pull-requests/

    Bitbucket offer a similar feature.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 02:32
    npm install -D husky
    
    npm i git-branch-is
    

    configure it through package.json

        "husky": {
          "hooks": {
            "pre-commit": "git-branch-is -r \"^((?!master).)*$\""
        }
      }
    

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 02:32

    Make local branch

     command: git branch <branch name>
    

    Go to branch through

    Command: git checkout <branch name>     
    

    Now your all local work save (through add . & commit ) into branch and then push to remote through

    command : git push origin <branch name>
    

    after that you can make pull request to master and merge to master. This is answer based on the linux (Ubuntu) system environment.

    If any miss then let me know?

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 02:34

    Consider using a git access control layer like gitolite

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 02:41

    You may want to use a commit-msg hook that checks whether the word merge occurs in the message for a tentative commit. Something like

    grep -iq merge "$1" || exit 1
    

    after a check for the branch. You may want to make the RE stricter than this. This is only a heuristic, of course, and anyone with write access to the central repo can circumvent this check.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-05 02:49

    Not a direct answer: consider using repos instead of branches for this. Imagine three repos: local, dev, and blessed. Local = your own repo where you work. Dev = the repo you push all your commits to and the one that your build process is monitoring for changes. Blessed = the repo that only the build process can push to and which you pull from. Thus you commit into local and push changes to dev. Auto-build does all it's testing of the commits you pushed and on success, pushes them to blessed. Then you (or anyone else) can pick them up from blessed and continue work from there.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题