How to generate 8 byte GUID value in c#? [duplicate]

Answer 1

The point of a GUID is to be "Globally" Unique, meaning that the likelihood of anybody ever coming up with the same unique identifier that someone else is already using for a different object must be so small that you're willing to bet your business on it. Smarter minds than mine have determined that 16 bytes, combined with the right algorithm, is sufficient to achieve this. Since 8 bytes gives you only a tiny, tiny fraction of the number of possibilities that 16 bytes would give, I wouldn't recommend using 8-byte GUIDs.

However, if you really want to, you could do something like this:

public struct SmallGuid
{
    byte FirstByte;
    byte SecondByte;
    ...
}

Then you could either generate random values for these bytes, or leverage the real Guid class, and pull half the bytes off of it to populate your SmallGuid.

Answer 2

You could take a Guid.NewGuid().ToByteArray() and run it through some hashing algorithm with a resulting size of 8 Byte (= 64 Bit).

EDIT: There is a Google-developed Hash-Algo returning 64Bits (see http://code.google.com/p/cityhash/ ) which can be used on Guid.NewGuid().ToString() .

Answer 3

Generate a random long, and then convert it to a hex string.

Alternatively, just sequentially allocate from unsigned long.

Answer 4

the following code will generate cryptographically unique 8 character strings:

 using System; 
using System.Security.Cryptography;
using System.Text;

namespace JustForFun
{


    public class UniqueId
    {   
        public static string GetUniqueKey()
        {
            int maxSize = 8;
            char[] chars = new char[62];
            string a;
            a = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ1234567890";
            chars = a.ToCharArray();
            int size = maxSize;
            byte[] data = new byte[1];
            RNGCryptoServiceProvider crypto = new RNGCryptoServiceProvider();
            crypto.GetNonZeroBytes(data);
            size = maxSize;
            data = new byte[size];
            crypto.GetNonZeroBytes(data);
            StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder(size);
            foreach (byte b in data)
            { result.Append(chars[b % (chars.Length - 1)]); }
            return result.ToString();
        }   
    }
}

Answer 5

With an 8 byte value (64 bits) you will have 2^64 possible outcomes. That's quite a few but significantly less than a GUID which has 2 ^ 128 possible values.

You could do something this simple:

        // generate 8 byte random value
        Random rnd = new Random();
        byte[] bytes = new byte[8];
        rnd.NextBytes(bytes);

        // displaying the value
        string myRndID = BitConverter.ToString(bytes).Replace("-", "");
        Console.WriteLine(myRndID);

For example:

XXXX           YY        ZZ
----           --        --
Random Value   Node ID   Days since epoch (of your definition)

Then:

Cat XXXX, YY and ZZ bytes together to create your pseudo-guID.

But that approach uses only random number generation. You could take a hint from the GUID algorithms (current and past) and populate some of the 8 bytes with a node ID value or a DateTime hash or something such combined with a random value to reduce the risk of collisions.

Still, the potential for collisions is there and if you do end up using an 8 byte pseudo-guID you should have a process defined for handling a collision.

Answer 6

See GUIDs are globally unique, but substrings of GUIDs aren't.

Hashing a GUID may work (but I'm not sure), but a better idea would be to come up with your own algorithm inspired by the GUID algorithm and based on the constraints of your system that you are aware of, for example:

• If you know that you will only be generating IDs on a handful of systems then the MAC address portion of the GUID can be shortened.
• Similarly if you assume that your app will be long gone in 100 years you can shorten the timstamp portion
• If you only have one algorithm then there is no need for the algorithm identifier
• If you also know that you wont be generating them too quickly you can shorten the "emergency uniquifier bits"