Dynamically choosing a view at runtime with Ember + Handlebars

Question

I am using Ember, Ember Data, and Handlebars to display a timeline with a number of different types of models. My current implementation, though functioning properly, seems lik

Answer 1

This is just off the top of my head: I would create a separate template/view for each model type. E.g. there would be a DesignView, OrderView, etc. Each of these would specify the template to use with templateName (all code coffeescript):

App.DesignView = Em.View.extend
  templateName: 'design'

App.OrderView = Em.View.extend
  templateName: 'order'

All of the custom rendering for each type would be done inside the view/template.

At this point we need to have some template logic to decide which view to show for each item. The easiest thing to do would be to store the viewType on the model.

App.Design = Em.Model.extend
  viewType: App.DesignView

App.Order = Em.Model.extend
  viewType: App.OrderView

Then the template could look like:

{{#collection contentBinding="App.selectedAccountController.everythingSorted"}}
  {{view content.viewType contentBinding="content"}}
{{/collection}}

This is not ideal, however, since we don't want the model to know about the view layer. Instead, we could create some factory logic to create a view for a model. Then we could create a computed property on the controller which contains an array of the models and their corresponding views:

App.selectedAccountController = Em.ArrayController.create
  ..
  viewForModel: (model) ->
    # if model is instance of Design return DesignView, Order return OrderView etc.
  everythingSortedWithViews: ( ->
    everythingSorted.map (model) ->
      {model: model, viewType: @viewForModel(model)}
  ).property('everythingSorted')

The template would then look like this:

{{#collection contentBinding="App.selectedAccountController.everythingSortedWithView"}}
  {{view content.viewType contentBinding="content.model"}}
{{/collection}}

There are probably better ways to do this. I would love to hear someone who is closer to the core of Ember give a solution.

Answer 2

This is what I used for a similar scenario.

Model 'page' hasMany 'activity'.

// App.PageModel
export default DS.Model.extend({
    index     : DS.attr('number'),
    activity  : DS.hasMany('activity',  { async: true })
});

Model 'activity' has property 'type' that references which template to use for the content in another property 'configuration'.

// App.ActivityModel
export default DS.Model.extend({
    activityId    : DS.attr('string'),
    type          : DS.attr('string'),
    page          : DS.belongsTo('page', { async: true }),
    configuration : DS.attr()
});

Note the lack of attribute type for configuration. This offers the means of storing a collection of randomly structured objects. For consistently structured objects, I suggest using Ember-Data.Model-Fragments.

Main template:

{{! page.hbs }}
{{#with activity}}
    {{#each}}
        {{partial type}}
    {{/each}}
{{/with}}

For type: 'static', it uses the {{{3 mustache option}}} to render a html string.

{{! static.hbs }}
{{{configuration.content}}}

The other options are far more complex, yet still simplified using a 'with'. ie: for type: 'multiplechoice',

{{! multiplechoice.hbs }}
{{#with configuration}}
    {{#each options}}
    <label {{bind-attr class=":label selected:checked:unchecked"}}>
        {{view Ember.Checkbox checkedBinding="selected" }}
        {{#if text.content}}
            {{{text.content}}}
        {{else}}
            {{text}}
        {{/if}}
    </label>
    {{/each}}
    {{ ...etc... }}
{{/with}}

With the partials, remember to consider nomenclature and/or folder structure depending on your environment, ie '_partialname.hbs' or 'viewname/partialname.hbs'

Answer 3

use ViewStates, see examples at:

http://jsfiddle.net/rsaccon/AD2RY/

Answer 4

I solved this by establishing my own convention using a mixin. A model corresponds to a view with a similar name. For example, an App.Design model instance corresponds to the view App.DesignView.

App.ViewTypeConvention = Ember.Mixin.create({
  viewType: function() {
    return Em.getPath(this.get('constructor') + 'View');
  }.property().cacheable()
});

I mix this into my models...

App.Design.reopen(App.ViewTypeConvention);
App.Order.reopen(App.ViewTypeConvention);

...and iterate over a mixed collection like this:

{{#each content}}
  {{view item.viewType tagName="li" contentBinding="this"}}
{{/each}}

This way, I avoid defining the convention explicitly in my models. Thanks to Gordon, I realized that the view could by specified using a property on an object. I would still really like to hear about the 'right' way to solve this problem.