MySQL Server version 5.1.41 with InnoDB plugin enabled. I have the following three tables for invoices: invoices, invoice_components and invoice_expenses. Table invoices has inv
I suspect it has to do with gap locks and next-key locks and the differences in the behaviour of REPEATABLE READ :
The excerpts are from MySQL docs: SET TRANSACTION syntax
For locking reads (SELECT with FOR UPDATE or LOCK IN SHARE MODE), UPDATE, and DELETE statements, locking depends on whether the statement uses a unique index with a unique search condition, or a range-type search condition. For a unique index with a unique search condition, InnoDB locks only the index record found, not the gap before it. For other search conditions, InnoDB locks the index range scanned, using gap locks or next-key (gap plus index-record) locks to block insertions by other sessions into the gaps covered by the range.
and READ COMMITTED :
Note: In MySQL 5.1, if the READ COMMITTED isolation level is used or the innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog system variable is enabled, there is no InnoDB gap locking except for foreign-key constraint checking and duplicate-key checking. Also, record locks for nonmatching rows are released after MySQL has evaluated the WHERE condition.
Perhaps OP can tell us the status of innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog system
variable and if the same locking occurs when this variable's setting is changed.
Also, if same locking happens with not sequential ids, like 18
and 20
, or 18
and 99
"For index records the search encounters, SELECT ... FROM ... FOR UPDATE blocks other sessions from doing SELECT ... FROM ... LOCK IN SHARE MODE or from reading in certain transaction isolation levels. Consistent reads will ignore any locks set on the records that exist in the read view"
What are those certain locks which can be applied with select for update so that other sessions cannot read locked record?
You are using a transaction; autocommit does not disable transactions, it just makes them automatically commit at the end of the statements that do not have an explicit start transaction
on them.
What is happening is, some other thread is holding a record lock on some record (you're updating every record in the table!) for too long, and your thread is being timed out.
You can see more details of the event by issuing a "SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS" after the event. Ideally do this on a quiet test-machine.