How to safely write a store that when updated never calls the copy constructor of the stored value?

前端 未结 0 1052
情书的邮戳
情书的邮戳 2021-02-04 08:02

I have the problem in some generic code that I require an accumulator or more precisely a mutable variable to hold a temporary in a loop. The code is part of a Reduce i

相关标签:
回答
  • 消灭零回复
提交回复
热议问题