Implementing pattern matching in C#

Question

In Scala, you can use pattern matching to produce a result depending on the type of the input. For instance:

val title = content match {
    case blogPost: BlogP         


        

Answer 1

Using Functional C# (from @Alireza)

var title = content.Match()
   .With<BlogPost>(blogPost => blogPost.Blog.Title + ": " + blogPost.Title)
   .With<Blog>(blog => blog.Title)
   .Result<string>();

Answer 2

In order to ensure total pattern matching, you would need to build the function into the type itself. Here's how I'd do it:

public abstract class Content
{
    private Content() { }

    public abstract T Match<T>(Func<Blog, T> convertBlog, Func<BlogPost, T> convertPost);

    public class Blog : Content
    {
        public Blog(string title)
        {
            Title = title;
        }
        public string Title { get; private set; }

        public override T Match<T>(Func<Blog, T> convertBlog, Func<BlogPost, T> convertPost)
        {
            return convertBlog(this);
        }
    }

    public class BlogPost : Content
    {
        public BlogPost(string title, Blog blog)
        {
            Title = title;
            Blog = blog;
        }
        public string Title { get; private set; }
        public Blog Blog { get; private set; }

        public override T Match<T>(Func<Blog, T> convertBlog, Func<BlogPost, T> convertPost)
        {
            return convertPost(this);
        }
    }

}

public static class Example
{
    public static string GetTitle(Content content)
    {
        return content.Match(blog => blog.Title, post => post.Blog.Title + ": " + post.Title);
    }
}

Answer 3

Pattern matching is one of those lovely features mostly found in functional programming languages like F#. There is a great project going on in codeplex named Functional C#. Consider the following F# code:

let operator x = match x with
                 | ExpressionType.Add -> "+"

let rec toString exp = match exp with
                       | LambdaExpression(args, body) -> toString(body)
                       | ParameterExpression(name) -> name
                       | BinaryExpression(op,l,r) -> sprintf "%s %s %s" (toString l) (operator op) (toString r)

Using the Functional C# library, the C# equivalent would be:

var Op = new Dictionary<ExpressionType, string> { { ExpressionType.Add, "+" } };

Expression<Func<int,int,int>> add = (x,y) => x + y;

Func<Expression, string> toString = null;
 toString = exp =>
 exp.Match()
    .With<LambdaExpression>(l => toString(l.Body))
    .With<ParameterExpression>(p => p.Name)
    .With<BinaryExpression>(b => String.Format("{0} {1} {2}", toString(b.Left), Op[b.NodeType], toString(b.Right)))
    .Return<string>();

Answer 4

Generic implementation I'm using, that can match against the type, condition or a value:

public static class Match
{
    public static PatternMatch<T, R> With<T, R>(T value)
    {
        return new PatternMatch<T, R>(value);
    }

    public struct PatternMatch<T, R>
    {
        private readonly T _value;
        private R _result;

        private bool _matched;

        public PatternMatch(T value)
        {
            _value = value;
            _matched = false;
            _result = default(R);
        }

        public PatternMatch<T, R> When(Func<T, bool> condition, Func<R> action)
        {
            if (!_matched && condition(_value))
            {
                _result = action();
                _matched = true;
            }

            return this;
        }

        public PatternMatch<T, R> When<C>(Func<C, R> action)
        {
            if (!_matched && _value is C)
            {
                _result = action((C)(object)_value);
                _matched = true;
            }
            return this;
        }


        public PatternMatch<T, R> When<C>(C value, Func<R> action)
        {
            if (!_matched && value.Equals(_value))
            {
                _result = action();
                _matched = true;
            }
            return this;
        }


        public R Result => _result;

        public R Default(Func<R> action)
        {
            return !_matched ? action() : _result;
        }
    }
}

And in your case, usage would look like:

Match.With<IContent, string>(content)
     .When<BlogPost>(blogPost => blogPost.Blog.Title)
     .When<Blog>(blog => blog.Title)
     .Result; // or just .Default(()=> "none");

Some other examples:

var result = Match.With<IFoo, int>(new Foo() { A = 5 })
    .When<IFoo>(foo => foo.A)
    .When<IBar>(bar => bar.B)
    .When<string>(Convert.ToInt32)
    .Result;
Assert.Equal(5, result);

var result = Match.With<int, string>(n)
    .When(x => x > 100, () => "n>100")
    .When(x => x > 10, () => "n>10")
    .Default(() => "");
Assert.Equal("n>10", result);

 var result = Match.With<int, string>(5)
     .When(1, () => "1")
     .When(5, () => "5")
     .Default(() => "e");
 Assert.Equal("5", result);

Answer 5

Check out my pattern matching implementation: repo

It's based on expressions, so it offers equal perfomance with nested ifs.

Example usage:

string s1 = "Hello";
string s2 = null;

Func<Option<string>> match = new Matcher<Option<string>>
{
     {s => s is None, s => Console.WriteLine("None")},
     {s => s is Some, s => Console.WriteLine((string)s) // or s.Value
};

match(s1); // Hello
match(s2); // None

Available throught NuGet: Nuget package