Common libraries in a large team

Question

Assume you have five products, and all of them use one or more of the company\'s internal libraries, written by individual developers.

It sounds simple but in practice,

Answer 1

I think that one shared library is better than 3 duplicate ones (and 1 tested is definitely better than 3 untested). That's because when you find and fix problem, this makes the whole application area more solid (and development and maintenance are more efficient).

BTW, that't one of the reasons (apart from contributing back to the community) why our company exposes our .NET shared libraries to the public as open-source.

Plus, there's less code to write. And you can designate one dev to enforce good development practices on the library and its usages (i.e. through code contracts enforced on the unit tests within library consumers). This improves quality and and reduces maintenance costs.

We store shared libraries as binaries in the solution. That comes from the logical requirement that any solution has to be atomic and independent (this rules out svn:externals links).

API compatibility is not an issue at all. Just let your integration server rebuild and retest the whole product stack (while updating all the inner references and propagating changes) and you'll always be sure that all internal API's are solid. And whomever breaks the API has to either fix it or update the usages.