What is the point of key-value coding?

前端 未结 3 1699
野性不改
野性不改 2021-02-01 07:15

Since Objective-C 2.0, we\'ve had @properties and autogenerated accessor methods. So today, what is the point of key-value coding? Under what circumstances is it

3条回答
  •  别那么骄傲
    2021-02-01 07:41

    It's almost never preferable to write out [myObject setValue:foo forKey:@"bar"] by hand, with a literal @"bar". We usually use KVC to access a property when we don't know which property we want to access until runtime.

    One example is an outlet in a xib. When you connect a text field's delegate outlet to the File's Owner in the xib, the xib records the connection as an object with three fields:

    • a reference to the text field (the object that has the outlet)
    • a reference to the file's owner placeholder (the destination of the connection)
    • the name of the outlet as a string, @"delegate"

    At runtime, the xib loader (part of the UIKit framework) deserializes the text field. Then it deserializes the connection object and uses it to establish the connection that you wired up in the xib. The xib loader has to set a property of the text field (the delegate property), but it doesn't know which property until it loads the xib at runtime, long after both your app and the UIKit framework were compiled.

    Another example of not knowing which property to access until runtime is the (little-known) ability of Core Animation to animate a custom property of your CALayer subclass. Say you create a subclass of CALayer called PolygonLayer, with a property named sides. You can animate the sides property using a standard CABasicAnimation:

    CABasicAnimation *animation = [CABasicAnimation animationWithKeyPath:@"sides"];
    animation.fromValue = @3;
    animation.toValue = @9;
    animation.autoreverses = YES;
    animation.duration = 1;
    [myPolygonLayer addAnimation:animation forKey:@"sides"];
    

    Presto, Core Animation will animate your layer's sides property from 3 to 9 and back. Yet the source code of Core Animation doesn't know anything about your sides property. (Check out this question for more details.)

    There are times we use KVC even though we know the property at compile-time. One example is when we want to take advantage of extra work KVC will do for us. For example, if you have an NSArray full of Person objects, and you want to get an array of every person's first name, you could write this:

    NSMutableArray *firstNames = [NSMutableArray array];
    for (Person *person in people) {
        [firstNames addObject:person.firstName];
    }
    

    But this is a case where KVC has a feature that makes it simpler. If you access a property of an array using KVC, KVC will actually access that property of every element in the array for you:

    NSArray *firstNames = [people valueForKey:@"firstName"];
    

    Another example where we might use KVC even though we know the property at compile-time is when the property is not statically declared as part of the class. For example, each NSManagedObject (part of Core Data) dynamically gives itself properties based on whatever entity that instance of NSManagedObject is representing. You can access those properties using KVC, although generally we prefer to declare them in a subclass of NSManagedObject or in a category of NSManagedObject.

提交回复
热议问题