Calling base constructor in perl

Question

What is the correct way to call the base constructor from the class constructor in Perl ?

I have seen syntax like this:

 my $class = shift; 
 my $a = sh         


        

Answer 1

This problem is why some people recommend not doing anything interesting in your new method. new is expected to create and return a blessed reference, it's hard to make a system that handle doing this twice for the same object from different parent classes.

A cleaner option is to have a new method that only creates the object and calls another method that can set up the object. This second method can behave in a way that allows multiple parent methods to be called. Effectively new is you allocator and this other method is your constructor.

package Mother;
use strict;
use warnings;

sub new {
    my ($class, @args) = @_;
    my $self = bless {}, $class;
    return $self->_init(@args);
}

sub _init {
    my ($self, @args) = @_;

    # do something

    return $self;
}

package Father;
use strict;
use warnings;

sub new {
    my ($class, @args) = @_;
    my $self = bless {}, $class;
    return $self->_init(@args);
}

sub _init {
    my ($self, @args) = @_;

    # do something else

    return $self;
}

package Child;
use strict;
use warnings;

use base qw(Mother Father);

sub _init {
    my ($self, @args) = @_;

    # do any thing that needs to be done before calling base classes

    $self->Mother::_init(@args); # Call Mother::_init explicitly, SUPER::_init would also call Mother::_init
    $self->Father::_init(@args); # Call Father::_init explicitly, SUPER::_init would NOT call Father::_init

    # do any thing that needs to be done after calling base classes

    return $self;
}

Ether is right about the complications your likely to find by using multiple inheritance. You still need to know that Father::_init won't override any decisions made by Mother::_init to start with. It will only get more complicated and harder to debug from there.

I would second the recommendation of Moose, its interface includes a better separation of the object creation and initialization than my example above that usually just works.