I had never really thought about whether a symbol could be a number in Lisp, so I played around with it today:
> \'1
1
> (+ \'1 \'1)
2
> (+ \'1 1)
2
>
Well, they are in fact very different. '1
is however precisely the same as (quote 1)
. (car ''x)
evaluates to the symbol 'quote'.
1
is an S-expression, it's the external representation of a datum, a number 1. To say that 1
is a 'number-object' or an S-expression to enter that object would both be acceptable. Often it is said that 1
is the external representation for the actual number object.
(quote 1)
is another S-expression, it's an S-expression for a list whose first element is the symbol 'quote' and whose second element is the number 1. This is where it's already different, syntactic keywords, unlike functions, are not considered objects in the language and they do not evaluate to them.
However, both are external representations of objects (data) which evaluate to the same datum. The number whose external representation is 1
, they are however most certainly not the same objects, the same, code, the same datum the same whatever, they just evaluate to the very same thing. Numbers evaluate to themselves. To say that they are the same is to say that:
(+ 1 (* 3 3))
And
(if "Strings are true" (* 5 (- 5 3)) "Strings are not true? This must be a bug!")
Are 'the same', they aren't, they are both different programs which just happen to terminate to the same value, a lisp form is also a program, a form is a datum which is also a program, remember.
Also, I was taught a handy trick once that shows that self-evaluating data are truly not symbols when entered:
(let ((num 4))
(symbol? num) ; ====> evaluates to #f
(symbol? 'num) ; ====> evaluates to #t
(symbol? '4) ; ====> evaluates to #f
(symbol? '#\c) ; #f again, et cetera
(symbol? (car ''x)) ; #t
(symbol? quote) ; error, in most implementations
)
Self evaluating data truly evaluate to themselves, they are not 'predefined symbols' of some sorts.