Any big sites using Client Side XSLT?

Question

Lately, I\'ve been pondering the somewhat non-mainstream architecture of building raw XML on the server side, and then using an XSLT stylesheet on the client to transform the XM

Answer 1

Like other people have mentioned, Blizzard has many sites that are client side xsl. I would recommend avoiding client side xsl. It is a really cool idea, but there are many unusual bugs that you need to work around.

In Firefox, any javascript that uses document.write will destroy the DOM. Also, the noscript plug-in for firefox stops client side xsl. In both cases, the user will see nothing. There doesn't seem to be a way to detect this kind of error, so a fall back will not work.

In IE, if you have anything that does a 30x redirect to something of a different origin (going from http to https or crossing sub domains), you will get an error for violating the same origin policy. You did not really violate the same origin policy, but IE acts like you did. For example, if you go to http://foo.example.com/login and that does a 302 redirect to https://bar.example.com/login.xml, IE will treat the xsl as if it came from bar.example.com and it will treat the xml as if it came from foo.example.com. So you will need to revert to something like a meta refresh for your redirects.

These are the things that I came up with off the top of my head. It is a neat idea, but be aware of these issues.