Imagine an implementation of the IDisposable
interface, that has some public methods.
If an instance of that type is shared between multiple threads and o
The simplest thing you can do is mark the private disposed variable as volatile
and inspect it at the beginning of your methods. You can then throw an ObjectDisposedException
if the object has already been disposed.
There are two caveats to this:
You shouldn't throw an ObjectDisposedException
if the method is an event handler. Instead you should just gracefully exit from the method if that is possible. The reason being is that there exists a race condition where events can be raised after you unsubscribe from them. (See this article by Eric Lippert for more information.)
This doesn't stop your class from being disposed while you are in the middle of executing one of your class methods. So if your class has instance members that can't be accessed after disposal, you're going to need to setup some locking behaviour to ensure access to these resources are controlled.
Microsoft's guidance around IDisposable says you should check for disposed on all methods, but I haven't personally found this necessary. The question really is, is something going to throw an exception or cause unintended side effects if you allow a method to execute after the class is disposed. If the answer is yes, you need to do some work to make sure that doesn't happen.
In terms of whether all IDisposable classes should be thread safe: No. Most of the use cases for disposable classes involve them only ever being accessed by a single thread.
That being said, you may want to investigate why you need your disposable class to be thread safe as it adds a lot of additional complexity. There may be an alternate implementation that allows you to not have to worry about thread safety issues in your disposable class.