Difference between shouldoverrideurlloading and shouldinterceptrequest?

前端 未结 2 1656
失恋的感觉
失恋的感觉 2021-01-31 09:44

Anyone please tell me the difference between methods public WebResourceResponse shouldInterceptRequest (WebView view, WebResourceRequest request) and public b

2条回答
  •  [愿得一人]
    2021-01-31 10:02

    The Android WebKit implementation allows the developer to modify a WebView through the android.webkit.WebSettings class such as

    • Support for JavaScript,
    • Support for Plugins,
    • File System Access,
    • Resource Inspection etc.

    In Resource Inspection, it is possible to inspect the requests for content and/or resources by overriding shouldOverrideUrlLoading and shouldInterceptRequest methods.

    But above two methods are use for different purpose such as

    1.shouldOverrideUrlLoading is called when a new page is about to be opened whereas shouldInterceptRequest is called each time a resource is loaded like a css file, a js file etc.

    2.If a user interactively requests a resource from within a WebView it is possible through the use of the shouldOverrideUrlLoading method of the WebViewClient class to intercept the request. Example code is presented below. Source

     private class MyWebViewClient extends WebViewClient {
         @Override public boolean shouldOverrideUrlLoading(WebView view, String url) {
            if (Uri.parse(url).getHost().equals("www.google.com")) {
                return true;
            }
            return false;
        }
     }
    

    The method gives the host application a chance to take over the control when a new URL is about to be loaded in the current WebView. A return value of true means the host application handles the URL, while return false means the current WebView handles the URL. The code above prevents resources from being loaded from the host “www.google.com”.

    However, the method does not intercept resource loading from within, such as from an IFRAME or src attribute within an HTML or SCRIPT tag for example. Additionally XmlHttpRequests would also not be intercepted. In order to intercept these requests you can make use of the WebViewClient shouldInterceptRequest method. Example code is presented below.

    @Override
    public WebResourceResponse shouldInterceptRequest(final WebView view, String url) {
        if (url.contains(".js")) {
            return getWebResourceResponseFromString();
        } else {
            return super.shouldInterceptRequest(view, url);
        }
    }
    private WebResourceResponse getWebResourceResponseFromString() {
        return getUtf8EncodedWebResourceResponse(new StringBufferInputStream("alert('!NO!')"));
    }
    private WebResourceResponse getUtf8EncodedWebResourceResponse(InputStream data) {
        return new WebResourceResponse("text/javascript", "UTF-8", data);
    }
    

    The method notifies the host application of a resource request and allows the application to return the data. If the return value is null, the WebView will continue to load the resource as usual. Otherwise, the return response and data will be used. The code above intercepts requests for JavaScript resources (.js) and returns an alert instead of the requested resource.

    See more at : WebViewClient shouldOverrideUrlLoading and shouldInterceptRequest

提交回复
热议问题