Probably the title question is not very explicit. I am using Qt5 on Windows7.
In a thread (QThread) at some point, in the \"process()\"
function/method, I m
In asynchronous programming, the "wait for" is considered an anti-pattern. Instead of waiting for things, design the code to react to a condition becoming fulfilled. E.g., connect the code to a signal.
One way of implementing this is to slice your actions into separate states, and do some work when each of the states is entered. Of course if the amount of work is non-trivial, use a separate slot instead of a lambda to keep things readable.
Note the absence of explicit memory management. Use of owning pointers to Qt classes is a premature optimization and should be avoided where unnecessary. The objects can be direct members of the Worker
(or its PIMPL).
The sub-objects must be all a part of the ownership hierarchy that has Worker
at the root. That way, you can safely move the Worker
instance to another thread, and the objects it uses will follow it. Of course you could also instantiate the Worker
in the correct thread - there's a simple idiom for that. The thread's event dispatcher owns the worker, thus when the thread's event loop quits (i.e. after invoking QThread::quit()
), the worker will be automatically disposed and no resources will leak.
template
void instantiateInThread(QThread * thread) {
Q_ASSERT(thread);
QObject * dispatcher = thread->eventDispatcher();
Q_ASSERT(dispatcher); // the thread must have an event loop
QTimer::singleShot(0, dispatcher, [dispatcher](){
// this happens in the given thread
new Obj(dispatcher);
});
}
The Worker's implementation:
class Worker : public QObject {
Q_OBJECT
QSslSocket sslSocket;
QTimer timer;
QStateMachine machine;
QState s1, s2, s3;
Q_SIGNAL void finished();
public:
explicit Worker(QObject * parent = {}) : QObject(parent),
sslSocket(this), timer(this), machine(this),
s1(&machine), s2(&machine), s3(&machine) {
timer.setSingleShot(true);
s1.addTransition(&sslSocket, SIGNAL(encrypted()), &s2);
s1.addTransition(&timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), &s3);
connect(&s1, &QState::entered, [this]{
// connect the socket here
...
timer.start(10000);
});
connect(&s2, &QState::entered, [this]{
// other_things here
...
// end other_things
emit finished();
});
machine.setInitialState(&s1);
machine.start();
}
};
Then:
void waitForEventDispatcher(QThread * thread) {
while (thread->isRunning() && !thread->eventDispatcher())
QThread::yieldCurrentThread();
}
int main(int argc, char ** argv) {
QCoreApplication app{argc, argv};
struct _ : QThread { ~Thread() { quit(); wait(); } thread;
thread.start();
waitForEventDispatcher(&thread);
instantiateInThread(&myThread);
...
return app.exec();
}
Note that connecting to QThread::started()
would be racy: the event dispatcher doesn't exist until some code within QThread::run()
had a chance to execute. Thus we have to wait for the thread to get there by yielding - this is very likely to get the worker thread to progress far enough within one or two yields. Thus it won't waste much time.