I am working on shared Matlab code and we would like to share a generated documentation as searchable HTML documents within our local network.
I know of the following me
I think you've researched this topic well (how to generate HTML documentation from MATLAB functions), now it's up to you to choose which method works best for you.
The publish function could be used to author documentation. You write regular M-files with specially crafted comments (in fact the file could be all comments with no code), then you publish the file to obtain rendered HTML (it also supports other targets such as PDF, DOC, LaTeX, etc...). Think of it as a simpler MATLAB-specific version of Markdown which used here on Stack Exchange sites to format posts.
One aspect you didn't mention is integrating the generated documentation into the builtin Help viewer. This is done by creating info.xml and demos.xml files, and organizing the documentation in a specific way. You could also make your custom docs searchable by building Lucene index files using builddocsearchdb function (which internally powers the search functionality in MATLAB custom docs). Note that it doesn't matter how you generated the HTML docs (you could have used publish
or even manually written HTML files).
In fact the publish
-based workflow is extendable, and you could use it in interesting ways by creating custom XSL template files to transform and render the parsed comments. For example I've seen it used to render equations using MathJax instead of relying on the built-in solution. Another example is publishing to MediaWiki markup (format used by Wikipedia). Other people use it to write blog posts (see the official blogs on the MATLAB Central which are creating this way), or even generate text files later processed by static site generators (like Jekyll and Octopress frameworks).
As far as I know, there are no public tools available that inspect MATLAB code on a deeper level and analyze function parameters. Best I could come up with is using reflection to obtain some metadata about functions and classes, although that solution is not perfect...
MathWorks seems to be using their own internal system to author HTML documentation. Too bad they don't share it with us users :)