in normal Scala map and flatMap are different in that flatMap will return a iterable of the data flattened out into a list. However in the Akka documentation, map and flatMap se
I am pasting the implementation of the two methods here. the difference in english terms is below and returns the result of the function as the new future
/** Creates a new future by applying a function to the successful result of
* this future. If this future is completed with an exception then the new
* future will also contain this exception.
*
* $forComprehensionExamples
*/
def map[S](f: T => S)(implicit executor: ExecutionContext): Future[S] = { // transform(f, identity)
val p = Promise[S]()
onComplete { v => p complete (v map f) }
p.future
}
/** Creates a new future by applying a function to the successful result of
* this future, and returns the result of the function as the new future.
* If this future is completed with an exception then the new future will
* also contain this exception.
*
* $forComprehensionExamples
*/
def flatMap[S](f: T => Future[S])(implicit executor: ExecutionContext): Future[S] = {
import impl.Promise.DefaultPromise
val p = new DefaultPromise[S]()
onComplete {
case f: Failure[_] => p complete f.asInstanceOf[Failure[S]]
case Success(v) => try f(v) match {
// If possible, link DefaultPromises to avoid space leaks
case dp: DefaultPromise[_] => dp.asInstanceOf[DefaultPromise[S]].linkRootOf(p)
case fut => fut.onComplete(p.complete)(internalExecutor)
} catch { case NonFatal(t) => p failure t }
}
p.future
}
From implementation the difference is that flatMap actually calls the function with result when the promise completes.
case Success(v) => try f(v) match
For a great article read: http//danielwestheide.com/blog/2013/01/16/the-neophytes-guide-to-scala-part-9-promises-and-futures-in-practice.html