Suggestions for making a reusable try/catch block in C#?

后端 未结 5 1690
故里飘歌
故里飘歌 2021-01-30 09:33

I have a class that has about 20-some methods in it. Each one does some web service message processing. I just had to make a change to it, and realized that every one of these m

5条回答
  •  一向
    一向 (楼主)
    2021-01-30 09:59

    I would do it like this:

    Create a method that contains the try/catch and pass an Action into it and execute that action inside the try part:

    public void Method1()
    {
        Action action = () =>
        {
            // actual processing of Method 1
        };
        SafeExecutor(action);
    }
    
    public void Method1b()
    {
        SafeExecutor(() =>
        {
            // actual processing of Method 1
        });
    }
    
    public void Method2(int someParameter)
    {
        Action action = () =>
        {
            // actual processing of Method 2 with supplied parameter
            if(someParameter == 1)
            ...
        };
        SafeExecutor(action);
    }
    
    public int Method3(int someParameter)
    {
        Func action = () =>
        {
            // actual processing of Method 3 with supplied parameter
            if(someParameter == 1)
                return 10;
            return 0;
        };
        return SafeExecutor(action);
    }
    
    private void SafeExecutor(Action action)
    {
        SafeExecutor(() => { action(); return 0; });
    }
    
    private T SafeExecutor(Func action)
    {
        try
        {
            return action();
        }
        catch (FaultException cfex)
        {
            // common stuff
        }
        catch (CustomException cfex)
        {
            // common stuff
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            // common stuff
        }
        finally
        {
            FinalizeServiceCall(wsBus, wsMessage, response, logProps);
        }
    
        return default(T);
    }
    

    The two versions of SafeExecutor give you the possibility to handle methods with and without return types.
    Method1b shows that you don't need the variable action in your methods, you can inline it, if you think that's more readable.

提交回复
热议问题