Django Manager Chaining

前端 未结 4 2093
独厮守ぢ
独厮守ぢ 2021-01-30 09:19

I was wondering if it was possible (and, if so, how) to chain together multiple managers to produce a query set that is affected by both of the individual managers. I\'ll expla

4条回答
  •  孤街浪徒
    2021-01-30 09:43

    I spent a while trying to come up with a way to build a nice factory to do this, but I'm running into a lot of problems with that.

    The best I can suggest to you is to chain your inheritance. It's not very generic, so I'm not sure how useful it is, but all you would have to do is:

    class GlobalMixin(DeleteMixin):
        is_global = models.BooleanField(default=True)
    
        objects = GlobalManager()
    
        class Meta:
            abstract = True
    
    class GlobalManager(DeleteManager):
        def globals(self):
            return self.get_query_set().filter(is_global=1)
    

    If you want something more generic, the best I can come up with is to define a base Mixin and Manager that redefines get_query_set() (I'm assuming you only want to do this once; things get pretty complicated otherwise) and then pass a list of fields you'd want added via Mixins.

    It would look something like this (not tested at all):

    class DeleteMixin(models.Model):
        deleted = models.BooleanField(default=False)
    
        class Meta:
            abstract = True
    
    def create_mixin(base_mixin, **kwargs):
        class wrapper(base_mixin):
            class Meta:
                abstract = True
        for k in kwargs.keys():
            setattr(wrapper, k, kwargs[k])
        return wrapper
    
    class DeleteManager(models.Manager):
        def get_query_set(self):
            return super(DeleteManager, self).get_query_set().filter(deleted=False)
    
    def create_manager(base_manager, **kwargs):
        class wrapper(base_manager):
            pass
        for k in kwargs.keys():
            setattr(wrapper, k, kwargs[k])
        return wrapper
    

    Ok, so this is ugly, but what does it get you? Essentially, it's the same solution, but much more dynamic, and a little more DRY, though more complex to read.

    First you create your manager dynamically:

    def globals(inst):
        return inst.get_query_set().filter(is_global=1)
    
    GlobalDeleteManager = create_manager(DeleteManager, globals=globals)
    

    This creates a new manager which is a subclass of DeleteManager and has a method called globals.

    Next, you create your mixin model:

    GlobalDeleteMixin = create_mixin(DeleteMixin,
                                     is_global=models.BooleanField(default=False),
                                     objects = GlobalDeleteManager())
    

    Like I said, it's ugly. But it means you don't have to redefine globals(). If you want a different type of manager to have globals(), you just call create_manager again with a different base. And you can add as many new methods as you like. Same for the manager, you just keep adding new functions that will return different querysets.

    So, is this really practical? Maybe not. This answer is more an exercise in (ab)using Python's flexibility. I haven't tried using this, though I do use some of the underlying principals of dynamically extending classes to make things easier to access.

    Let me know if anything is unclear and I'll update the answer.

提交回复
热议问题