Source control in Visual Studio 2010?

Question

After doing some search on SO, Google and MSDN forums I\'ve become frustrated that there is so little information for what might seem like an obvious question and possibly a dum

Answer 1

I have use Subversion and Mecurial on projects and both made me recall fondly working with the much hated (for good reason) Visual Source Safe. Both will "work", but both show their unix-programmer roots (no pun intended) with cryptic error messages and goofy, black magic nerdisms. Source control should be simple, reliable and stay out the way. Neither SNV nor Mecurial qualify. Mecurial is easier to use if nothing goes wrong -- which is about 80% of the time.

If you are a single developer working alone, I would use Mercurial.

Here is a sample of why I hate these:

pushing to Z:\Repos\SupplierAdminWebRepo searching for changes new remote heads on branch 'default' [Error: abort: push creates new remote head 9cfbad6249a9!] new remote head 9cfbad6249a9 [Error: (did you forget to merge? use push -f to force)]

[Operation completed. Exit code: 255]