This question is NOT for the difference between STREAM type and DATAGRAM type INTERNET sockets. I know that STREAM sockets use TCP, Datagram sockets use UDP and all the T
Just as the manual page says Unix sockets are always reliable. The difference between SOCK_STREAM
and SOCK_DGRAM
is in the semantics of consuming data out of the socket.
Stream socket allows for reading arbitrary number of bytes, but still preserving byte sequence. In other words, a sender might write 4K of data to the socket, and the receiver can consume that data byte by byte. The other way around is true too - sender can write several small messages to the socket that the receiver can consume in one read. Stream socket does not preserve message boundaries.
Datagram socket, on the other hand, does preserve these boundaries - one write by the sender always corresponds to one read by the receiver (even if receiver's buffer given to read(2) or recv(2) is smaller then that message).
So if your application protocol has small messages with known upper bound on message size you are better off with SOCK_DGRAM
since that's easier to manage.
If your protocol calls for arbitrary long message payloads, or is just an unstructured stream (like raw audio or something), then pick SOCK_STREAM
and do the required buffering.
Performance should be the same since both types just go through local in-kernel memory, just the buffer management is different.