The company I work for provides testing services for the healthcare industry. As part of our services, we need to send email to our clients\' employees. Typically, these are t
You're probably looking for Reply-To
. It's an official and widely supported header, unlike On-Behalf-Of
, and it's not subject to the same spam checks as From
.
If you really wanted to appear as sending on behalf of another user, the "mostly" correct way, by SMTP standards, would be to put your "real" address in Sender:
and your client's address (of whom you're sending on behalf) in From:
. However, From:
is specifically targeted by DMARC, a very strict spam prevention protocol implemented by most major e-mail providers. They won't overlook a From:
DMARC failure just because you have a valid Sender:
header.
DMARC allows domain owners to specify how SPF and DKIM should be applied to the From:
header. A popular policy is to reject e-mail that fails either SPF or DKIM, which means your e-mail won't even be flagged as spam: it will be downright rejected.
Sender:
+ From:
still works, technically. It was originally created with the intention of being used by people in the same organization, such as a secretary or an assistant. This has turned into a hard constraint with the advent of spam prevention mechanisms.