Is it possible to implement bitwise operators using integer arithmetic?

后端 未结 6 1315
青春惊慌失措
青春惊慌失措 2021-01-29 22:05

I am facing a rather peculiar problem. I am working on a compiler for an architecture that doesn\'t support bitwise operations. However, it handles signed 16-bit integer arithme

6条回答
  •  执念已碎
    2021-01-29 22:27

    First solutions for shifting (shift is the shift distance, must not be negative, a is the operand to be shifted and contains also the result when done). The power table is used by all three shift operations.

    // table used for shift operations
    powtab = { 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384, -32768 };
    
    // logical shift left
    if (shift > 15) {
         a = 0; // if shifting more than 15 bits to the left, value is always zero
    } else {
         a *= powtab[shift];
    }
    
    // logical shift right (unsigned)
    if (shift > 15) {
        a = 0; // more than 15, becomes zero
    } else if (shift > 0) {
        if (a < 0) {
            // deal with the sign bit (15)
            a += -32768;
            a /= powtab[shift];
            a += powtab[15 - shift];
        } else {
            a /= powtab[shift];
        }
    }
    
    // arithmetic shift right (signed)
    if (shift >= 15) {
        if (a < 0) {
            a = -1;
        } else {
            a = 0;
        }
    } else if (shift > 0) {
        if (a < 0) {
            // deal with the sign bit
            a += -32768;
            a /= powtab[shift];
            a -= powtab[15 - shift];
        } else {
            // same as unsigned shift
            a /= powtab[shift];
        }
    }
    

    For AND, OR and XOR i could not come up with a simple solution, so i'll do it with looping over each single bit. There might be a better trick to do this. Pseudocode assumes a and b are input operands, c is the result value, x is the loop counter (each loop must run exactly 16 times):

    // XOR (^)
    c = 0;
    for (x = 0; x <= 15; ++x) {
        c += c;
        if (a < 0) {
            if (b >= 0) {
                c += 1;
            }
        } else if (b < 0) {
            c += 1;
        }
        a += a;
        b += b;
    }
    
    // AND (&)
    c = 0;
    for (x = 0; x <= 15; ++x) {
        c += c;
        if (a < 0) {
            if (b < 0) {
                c += 1;
            }
        }
        a += a;
        b += b;
    }
    
    // OR (|)
    c = 0;
    for (x = 0; x <= 15; ++x) {
        c += c;
        if (a < 0) {
            c += 1;
        } else if (b < 0) {
            c += 1;
        }
        a += a;
        b += b;
    }
    

    Thats assuming that all variables are 16 bits and all operations behave as signed (so a<0 actually is true when bit 15 is set).

    EDIT: i actually tested all possible operand values (-32768 to 32767) for shifts ranging from 0 to 31 for correctness and it works correctly (assuming integer divides). For the AND/OR/XOR code an exhaustive test takes too long on my machine, but since the code for these is pretty simple there should be no edge cases anyway.

提交回复
热议问题