Continuing on from ideas in: Are there any provable real-world languages?
I don\'t know about you, but I\'m sick of writing code that I can\'t guarantee.
It's certainly possible to prove some properties of Haskell programs formally. I've had to do so at my FP exam: given two expressions, prove that they denote the same function. It's not possible to do this in general since Haskell is Turing-complete, so any mechanical prover would either have to be a proof assistant (semi-automatic with user guidance) or a model checker.
There have been attempts in this direction, see e.g. P-logic: property verification for Haskell programs or Proving the correctness of functional programs using Mizar. Both are academic papers describing methods more than implementations.